Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.Arash Abizadeh - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
    The question of whether or not a closed border entry policy under the unilateral control of a democratic state is legitimate cannot be settled until we first know to whom the justification of a regime of control is owed. According to the state sovereignty view, the control of entry policy, including of movement, immigration, and naturalization, ought to be under the unilateral discretion of the state itself: justification for entry policy is owed solely to members. This position, however, is inconsistent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   210 citations  
  • Citizenship and the right to vote.Lardy Heather - 1997 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The principle of constituted identities and the obligation to include.Rogers M. Smith - 2008 - Ethics and Global Politics 1 (3).
    Most analysts agree that democratic theorists have not offered a persuasive answer to the question of how the boundaries of a demos, a democratic people, should legitimately be defined. Some contend that boundaries should be maintained in ways that preserve sufficient sense of common identity to sustain support for redistributive policies. Many others endorse the “principle of all affected interests,” but it has been widely criticized as unrealistically destructive of too many existing community boundaries. This essay argues for an alternative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Should Expatriates Vote?Claudio López-Guerra - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2):216-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • Nations, Overlapping Generations and Historic Injustice.Daniel Butt - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):357-367.
    This article considers the question of the responsibility that present day generations bear as a result of the actions of their ancestors. Is it morally significant that we share a national identity with those responsible for the perpetration of historic injustice? The article argues that we can be guilty of wrongdoing stemming from past wrongdoing if we are members of nations that are responsible for an ongoing failure to fulfil rectificatory duties. This rests upon three claims: that the failure to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations