Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. La filosofia aristotelico-cartesiana di Johannes de Raey.Andrea Strazzoni - 2011 - Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 7 (1):107-132.
    The search for an agreement between Aristotle’s and Descartes’ philosophy was aimed at making Cartesian physics acceptable in the Dutch universities by showing its consistency with Aristotelian thought. Their agreement is defended by Johannes De Raey in the Clavis philosophiae naturalis (1654), where he interprets the Corpus Aristotelicum from a Cartesian standpoint. Those Aristotelian positions which are inconsistent with Descartes’ are treated as erroneous. The Scholastic positions, moreover, are considered as distant from the true Aristotelian philosophy rediscovered by Descartes.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Experimental versus Speculative Natural Philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2005 - In Peter R. Anstey & John Schuster (eds.), The science of nature in the seventeenth century: patterns of change in early modern natural philosophy. Springer Science and Business Media. pp. 215-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy.Michael Losonsky - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This book traces the linguistic turns in the history of modern philosophy and the development of the philosophy of language from Locke to Wittgenstein. It examines the contributions of canonical figures such as Leibniz, Mill, Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Austin, Quine, and Davidson, as well as those of Condillac, Humboldt, Chomsky, and Derrida. Michael Losonsky argues that the philosophy of language begins with Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He shows how the history of the philosophy of language in the modern period (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Ramus and other Renaissance philosophers on subjectivity.Riccardo Pozzo - 2003 - Topoi 22 (1):5-13.
    This paper considers philosophical approaches that are relevant to the intertwinement of logic, metaphysics, and psychology proposed by the Aquinas commentator Tommaso de Vio Cardinal Cajetan, the humanist Petrus Ramus, the pure Aristotelian Cornelius Martini, the Semi-Ramist Bartholomaeus Keckermann, and the lexicographer Rudolf Goclenius. Mostly, however, it is about Ramus and his followers, the Ramists, because of the role they played in exacerbating a discussion on the constitution of objectivity during the Renaissance that was to have an impact on Cartesian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations