Universes of types were introduced into constructive type theory by Martin-Löf [3]. The idea of forming universes in type theory is to introduce a universe as a set closed under a certain specified ensemble of set constructors, say ?. The universe then “reflects”?.This is the second part of a paper which addresses the exact logical strength of a particular such universe construction, the so-called superuniverse due to Palmgren (cf.[4–6]).It is proved that Martin-Löf type theory with a superuniverse, termed MLS, is (...) a system whose proof-theoretic ordinal resides strictly above the Feferman-Schütte ordinal Γ0 but well below the Bachmann-Howard ordinal. Not many theories of strength between Γ0 and the Bachmann-Howard ordinal have arisen. MLS provides a natural example for such a theory. In this second part of the paper the concern is with the with upper bounds. (shrink)

It is shown how the strong ordinal notation systems that figure in proof theory and have been previously defined by employing large cardinals, can be developed directly on the basis of their recursively large counterparts. Thereby we provide a completely new approach to well-ordering proofs as will be exemplified by determining the proof-theoretic ordinal of the systemKPM of [R91].

KPM is a subsystem of set theory designed to formalize a recursively Mahlo universe of sets. In this paper we show that a certain ordinal notation system is sufficient to measure the proof-theoretic strength ofKPM. This involves a detour through an infinitary calculus RS(M), for which we prove several cutelimination theorems. Full cut-elimination is available for derivations of $\Sigma (L_{\omega _1^c } )$ sentences, whereω 1 c denotes the least nonrecursive ordinal. This paper is self-contained, at least from a technical (...) point of view. (shrink)

This paper deals with universes in explicit mathematics. After introducing some basic definitions, the limit axiom and possible ordering principles for universes are discussed. Later, we turn to least universes, strictness and name induction. Special emphasis is put on theories for explicit mathematics with universes which are proof-theoretically equivalent to Feferman's.

In this paper we establish the proof-theoretic equivalence of (i) $\hbox {\sf ATR}$ and $\widehat{\hbox{\sf ID}}_{\omega}$ , (ii) $\hbox{\sf ATR}_0+ (\Sigma^1_1-\hbox{\sf DC})$ and $\widehat{\hbox {\sf ID}}_{<\omega^\omega} , and (iii) $\hbox {\sf ATR}+(\Sigma^1_1-\hbox{\sf DC})$ and $\widehat{\hbox {\sf ID}}_{<\varepsilon_0} $.

This paper is mainly concerned with proof-theoretic analysis of some second-order systems of explicit mathematics with a non-constructive minimum operator. By introducing axioms for variable types we extend our first-order theory BON to the elementary explicit type theory EET and add several forms of induction as well as axioms for μ. The principal results then state: EET plus set induction is proof-theoretically equivalent to Peano arithmetic PA <0).

We study and some of its most important extensions primarily from a proof-theoretic perspective, determine their consistency strengths by exhibiting equivalent systems in the realm of traditional set theory and introduce a new and interesting extension of which is conservative over.