Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. I—Peter Simons: Relations and Truthmaking.Peter Simons - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):199-213.
    The metaphysics of relations is still in its infancy. We use the idea of truthmaking to gain purchase on this metaphysics. Assuming a modest supervenience conception of truthmaking, where true relational predications require multiply dependent truthmakers, these are indispensable relations. Though some such relations are required, none are needed for internal relatedness, nor for several other kinds of relational predication. Discerning the metaphysically basic kinds of relations is fraught with uncertainties, but must be tackled if progress is to be made.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • On universals.W. V. Quine - 1947 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (3):74-84.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Nominalism, empiricism and universals--I.Arthur Pap - 1959 - Philosophical Quarterly 9 (37):330-340.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Quantitative parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.
    In this paper, I motivate the view that quantitative parsimony is a theoretical virtue: that is, we should be concerned not only to minimize the number of kinds of entities postulated by our theories (i. e. maximize qualitative parsimony), but we should also minimize the number of entities postulated which fall under those kinds. In order to motivate this view, I consider two cases from the history of science: the postulation of the neutrino and the proposal of Avogadro's hypothesis. I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   119 citations  
  • Bradley’s Regress.Anna-Sofia Maurin - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):794-807.
    Ever since F. H. Bradley first formulated his famous regress argument philosophers have been hard at work trying to refute it. The argument fails, it has been suggested, either because its conclusion just does not follow from its premises, or it fails because one or more of its premises should be given up. In this paper, the Bradleyan argument, as well as some of the many and varied reactions it has received, is scrutinized.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1527 citations  
  • Steps toward a constructive nominalism.Nelson Goodman & Willard van Orman Quine - 1947 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):105-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   166 citations  
  • Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism.Gail Fine - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):262-71.
    This paper considers and criticizes david armstrong's defense in his book of an allegedly nonrelational version of realism, "universals and scientific realism". It also challenges his claim that plato, But not aristotle, Held a relational version of realism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Universals and Metaphysical Realism.Alan Donagan - 1963 - The Monist 47 (2):211-246.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations