Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Understanding arguments: an introduction to informal logic.Robert J. Fogelin - 1991 - San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
    Now in its Eighth Edition, UNDERSTANDING ARGUMENTS: AN INTRODUCTION TO INFORMAL LOGIC, 8th Edition. has proven itself to be an exceptional guide to understanding and constructing arguments in the context of students' academic studies as well as their subsequent professional careers. Its tried and true strengths include multiple approaches to the analysis of arguments; a thorough grounding on the uses of language in everyday discourse; and chapters in the latter half of the book that apply abstract concepts to concrete legal, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • What the tortoise said to Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 4 (14):278-280.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   628 citations  
  • A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   172 citations  
  • Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Synthese 152 (2):237-284.
    This paper addresses the problem posed by the current split between the two opposed hypotheses in the growing literature on the fallacy of begging the question the epistemic hypothesis, based on knowledge and belief, and the dialectical one, based on formal dialogue systems. In the first section, the nature of split is explained, and it is shown how each hypothesis has developed. To get the beginning reader up to speed in the literature, a number of key problematic examples are analyzed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Begging the question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
    No topic in informal logic is more important than begging the question. Also, none is more subtle or complex. We cannot even begin to understand the fallacy of begging the question without getting clear about arguments, their purposes, and circularity. So I will discuss these preliminary topics first. This will clear the path to my own account of begging the question. Then I will anticipate some objections. Finally, I will apply my account to a well-known and popular response to scepticism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Petitio and the Purpose of Arguing.Frank Jackson - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1):26-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Epistemic conceptions of begging the question.Allan Hazlett - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):343-363.
    A number of epistemologists have recently concluded that a piece of reasoning may be epistemically permissible even when it is impossible for the reasoning subject to present her reasoning as an argument without begging the question. I agree with these epistemologists, but argue that none has sufficiently divorced the notion of begging the question from epistemic notions. I present a proposal for a characterization of begging the question in purely pragmatic terms.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic.Robert Fogelin - 1978 - Informal Logic 1 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (2):171-175.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations