Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Questions in montague english.Charles L. Hamblin - 1973 - Foundations of Language 10 (1):41-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   283 citations  
  • Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction.Ruth Kempson - 1986 - In Charles Travis (ed.), Meaning and interpretation. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell. pp. 77--103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Pragmatics.S. C. Levinson - 1983 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (3):531-532.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   532 citations  
  • Analytic psychology.G. F. Stout - 1896 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4 (4):4-5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Natural History of Negation.Jon Barwise & Laurence R. Horn - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   284 citations  
  • Pragmatics, Implicature, Presuposition and Lógical Form.Gerald Gazdar - 1979 - Critica 12 (35):113-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   239 citations  
  • Mathematical Methods in Linguistics.Barbara H. Partee, Alice ter Meulen & Robert E. Wall - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):271-272.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • A theory of focus interpretation.Mats Rooth - 1992 - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):75-116.
    According to the alternative semantics for focus, the semantic reflec of intonational focus is a second semantic value, which in the case of a sentence is a set of propositions. We examine a range of semantic and pragmatic applications of the theory, and extract a unitary principle specifying how the focus semantic value interacts with semantic and pragmatic processes. A strong version of the theory has the effect of making lexical or construction-specific stipulation of a focus-related effect in association-with-focus constructions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   281 citations  
  • Syntax and semantics of questions.Lauri Karttunen - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):3--44.
    W. Labov's & T. Labov's findings concerning their child grammar acquisition ("Learning the Syntax of Questions" in Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language, Campbell, R. & Smith, P. Eds, New York: Plenum Press, 1978) are interpreted in terms of different semantics of why & other wh-questions. Z. Dubiel.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   313 citations  
  • (1 other version)Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics.Robyn Carston - 1988 - In Ruth M. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 155–181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   124 citations  
  • Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Warren Ingber, Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   263 citations  
  • Questions, Answers, and Logic.Pavel Tichy - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (4):275 - 284.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   799 citations  
  • Do quantifiers branch?G. Fauconnier - 1975 - Linguistic Inquiry 6:555--567.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Conversational Coherency.Rachel Reichman - 1978 - Cognitive Science 2 (4):283-327.
    A major goal of this work is to specify some steps of the process by which participants maintain coherency in their conversations.The underlying element of the analysis is a construct called a “context space.” Roughly, a group of utterances that refers to a single issue or episode forms the basis for a context space. Superficially, a conversation is a sequence of utterances; at a deeper level it is a structured entity whose utterances can be parsed into hierarchically related context spaces.As (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations