Kruskal proved that finite trees are well-quasi-ordered by hom(e)omorphic embeddability. Friedman observed that this statement is not provable in predicative analysis. Friedman also proposed (see in [Simpson]) some stronger variants of the Kruskal theorem dealing with finite labeled trees under home(e)omorphic embeddability with a certain gap-condition, where labels are arbitrary finite ordinals from a fixed initial segment of ω. The corresponding limit statement, expressing that for all initial segments of ω these labeled trees are well-quasi-ordered, is provable in Π 1 (...) 1 -CA, but not in the analogous theory Π 1 1 -CA 0 with induction restricted to sets. Schutte and Simpson proved that the one-dimensional case of Friedman's limit statement dealing with finite labeled intervals is not provable in Peano arithmetic. However, Friedman's gap-condition fails for finite trees labeled with transfinite ordinals. In [Gordeev 1] I proposed another gap-condition and proved the resulting one-dimensional modified statements for all (countable) transfinite ordinal-labels. The corresponding universal modified one-dimensional statement UM 1 is provable in (in fact, is equivalent to) the familiar theory ATR 0 whose proof-theoretic ordinal is Γ 0 . In [Gordeev 1] I also announced that, in the general case of arbitrarily-branching finite trees labeled with transfinite ordinals, in the proof-theoretic sense the hierarchy of the limit modified statements $\mathbf{M}_{ (which are denoted by LM λ in the present note) is as strong as the hierarchy of the familiar theories of iterated inductive definitions (more precisely, see [Gordeev 1, Concluding Remark 3]). In this note I present a "positive" proof of the full universal modified statement UM, together with a short proof of the crucial "reverse" results which is based on Okada's interpretation of the well-established ordinal notations of Buchholz corresponding to the theories of iterated inductive definitions. Formally the results are summarized in $\S5$ below. (shrink)

In this paper we calibrate the exact proof-theoretic strength of Kruskal's theorem, thereby giving, in some sense, the most elementary proof of Kruskal's theorem. Furthermore, these investigations give rise to ordinal analyses of restricted bar induction.

For f: On → On let supp: = ξ: 0, and let S := {f : On → On : supp finite}. For f,g ϵ S definef ≤ g : ↔ [h one-to-one ⁁ f ≤ g)].A function ψ : S → On is called monotonic increasing, if f≤ψ and if f ≤ g implies ψ ≤ ψ. For a mapping ψ : S → On let Clψ be the least set T of ordinals which contains 0 as an element (...) and which is closed under the following rule: If f ϵ S, range ⊆ T and supp ⊆ T, then ψ ϵ T. Let φ be the enumeration function of the class {ξ: [ξ = ωn]}. Let φ be the induced Schütte-Klammerterm-function which generates the Schütte-Veblen-hierarchy of ordinals. Then φ is monotonic increasing. We show: If ψ: S → On is monotonic increasing, then otyp) ≤ min {ξ : ξ = Φ, where 1ξ = 1 if α = ξ and 1ξ = 0 if α ↔ = 0 if α ≠ ξ. For τ an ordinal let Sτ := {f ϵ S : supp ⊆ τ}. A function ψ : Sτ → On is called τ-monotonic increasing if fξ and if f ≤ g implies ψ ≤ . For a function ψ Sτ → On let Clψ ↔ τ be the least set T of ordinals, which contains 0 as an element, such that if f ϵ Sτ and range ϵ T, then ψ ϵ T. We show: if ≥2 and if ψ Sτ → On is τ-monotonic increasing, then otyp ↔ τ) ≤. We also prove a generalization of this theorem in terms of well-partial orderings. MSC: 03F15, 03E10, 06A06. (shrink)