Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Kantian Remorse with and without Self-Retribution.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2022 - Kantian Review 27 (3):421-441.
    This is a semifinal draft of a forthcoming paper. Kant’s account of the pain of remorse involves a hybrid justification based on self-retribution, but constrained by forward-looking principles which say that we must channel remorse into improvement, and moderate its pain to avoid damaging our rational agency. Kant’s corpus also offers material for a revisionist but textually-grounded alternative account based on wrongdoers’ sympathy for the pain they cause. This account is based on the value of care, and has forward-looking constraints (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Mary J. Gregor (ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   869 citations  
  • Kant's Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis.Henry E. Allison - 2019 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Although a good deal has been written about Kant's conception of free will in recent years, there has been no serious attempt to examine in detail the development of his views on the topic. This book endeavours to remedy the situation by tracing Kant's thoughts on free will from his earliest discussions of it in the 1750s through to his last accounts in the 1790s. This developmental approach is of interest for at least two reasons. First, it shows that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Chapter 8 Kant’s Concept of Moral Imputatio.Faustino Fabbianelli - 2015 - In Robert R. Clewis (ed.), Reading Kant's Lectures. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 200-220.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Degrees of Responsibility in Kant’s Practical Philosophy.Claudia Blöser - 2015 - Kantian Review 20 (2):183-209.
    It has been argued that Kants actions. However, it would be uncompromising to allow for only two possibilities: either full responsibility or none. Moreover, in the Metaphysics of Morals Kant himself claims that there can be degrees of responsibility, depending on the magnitude of the obstacles that have to be overcome when acting. I will show that this claim is consistent with Kant’s theory as a whole and thereby make transparent how degrees of responsibility are possible for Kant. The solution (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridicial Laws in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals.Marcus Willaschek - 2002 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals: interpetative essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Persons, punishment, and free will skepticism.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):143-163.
    The purpose of this paper is to provide a justification of punishment which can be endorsed by free will skeptics, and which can also be defended against the "using persons as mere means" objection. Free will skeptics must reject retributivism, that is, the view that punishment is just because criminals deserve to suffer based on their actions. Retributivists often claim that theirs is the only justification on which punishment is constrained by desert, and suppose that non-retributive justifications must therefore endorse (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Some remarks on Ludwig Heinrich Jakob's Examination of Mendelssohn's morning hours (1786).Immanuel Kant - 2007 - In Anthropology, history, and education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   135 citations