Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
    Coalescent argumentation is a normative ideal that involves the joining together of two disparate claims through recognition and exploration of opposing positions. By uncovering the crucial connection between a claim and the attitudes, beliefs, feelings, values and needs to which it is connected dispute partners are able to identify points of agreement and disagreement. These points can then be utilized to effect coalescence, a joining or merging of divergent positions, by forming the basis for a mutual investigation of non-conflictual options (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   169 citations  
  • Two Models of Abductive Inquiry.Brian Domino - 1994 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 27 (1):63 - 65.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning.Albert R. Jonsen & Stephen Toulmin (eds.) - 1988 - University of California Press.
    In this engaging study, the authors put casuistry into its historical context, tracing the origin of moral reasoning in antiquity, its peak during the sixteenth and early seventeenth century, and its subsequent fall into disrepute from the mid-seventeenth century.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   255 citations  
  • Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity.Gregory Bateson - 2002 - Hampton Press (NJ).
    A re-issue of Gregory Bateson's classic work. It summarizes Bateson's thinking on the subject of the patterns that connect living beings to each other and to their environment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   313 citations  
  • Abduction and Rhetorical Theory.Michael D. Bybee - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (4):281 - 300.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Theory of Discourse: The Aims of Discourse.James L. Kinneavy - 1972 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (3):188-191.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Abductive inferences and the structure of scientific knowledge.M. D. Bybee - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):25-46.
    The received theories of epistemology identify abductive inferences with the cognitive patterns of speculation (hypothesis formation) and insist that they cannot verify or confirm hypotheses. I criticize various descriptions of abduction, offer a structural analysis of abductive inference,, characterize abduction without alluding to its putative role in inquiry, and then demonstrate that some abductions do provide evidence and that not all scientific hypotheses derive from abductive inferences. This result challenges those notions of scientific k knowledge that dismiss some central scientific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations