Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Implementing the “Responsibility to Protect”: Where Expectations Meet Reality.Jennifer M. Welsh - 2010 - Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4):415-430.
    Scholars of RtoP need a much deeper understanding of both how norms evolve and the competing normative commitments that drive those who remain skeptical of endowing the international community with a responsibility to protect.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On.Alex J. Bellamy - 2010 - Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2):143-169.
    States' Responsibility to Protect vulnerable populations has become a prominent feature in international debates about preventing genocide and mass atrocities and about protecting potential victims. But profound disagreements persist about RtoP's function, meaning, and proper use.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Sovereignty is no longer sacrosanct: Codifying humanitarian intervention.Jarat Chopra & Thomas G. Weiss - 1992 - Ethics and International Affairs 6:95–117.
    Chopra and Weiss address perhaps the fundamental issue in international relations today: the sacrosanct sets of sovereignty. The word "sovereignty" explains why the international community has difficulty countering human rights violations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Assessing the African Union's Right of Humanitarian Intervention.Kwame Akonor - 2010 - Criminal Justice Ethics 29 (2):157-173.
    In an attempt to overcome the legacy of its predecessor body, the Organization of African Unity, which so often ignored atrocities in member states due to a doctrine of non-interference, the...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations