Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. [REVIEW]Mirjam Curno, Sera Tort, Paola De Castro, Thomas F. Babor & Shirin Heidari - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
    BackgroundSex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines.MethodsA panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.Timothy H. Vines, Arianne Y. K. Albert & Charles W. Fox - 2017 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (1).
    BackgroundIt is commonly reported by editors that it has become harder to recruit reviewers for peer review and that this is because individuals are being asked to review too often and are experiencing reviewer fatigue. However, evidence supporting these arguments is largely anecdotal.Main bodyWe examine responses of individuals to review invitations for six journals in ecology and evolution. The proportion of invitations that lead to a submitted review has been decreasing steadily over 13 years (2003–2015) for four of the six (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations