Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.G. Kent - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):186-190.
    BACKGROUND: It can be argued that the ethical conduct of research involves achieving a balance between the rights and needs of three parties-potential research participants, society, and researchers. Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) have a number of roles and functions in the research enterprise, but there have been some indications that LREC members, researchers and the public can have different views about these responsibilities. Any such differences are potential sources of disagreement and misunderstanding. OBJECTIVES: To compare the views of LREC (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Money and Distorted Ethical Judgments about Research: Ethical Assessment of the TeGenero TGN1412 Trial. [REVIEW]Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Franklin G. Miller - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):76-81.
    The recent TeGenero phase I trial of a novel monoclonal antibody in healthy volunteers produced a drastic inflammatory reaction in participants receiving the experimental agent. Commentators on the ethics of the research have focused considerable attention on the role of financial considerations: the for-profit status of the biotechnology company and Contract Research Organization responsible respectively for sponsoring and conducting the trial and the amount of monetary compensation to participants. We argue that these financial considerations are largely irrelevant and distort ethical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations