Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Theory of Conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1968 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford,: Blackwell. pp. 98-112.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1058 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes.Edward R. Wierenga - 1989 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    The Nature of God explores a perennial problem in the philosophy of religion.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • The Coherence of Theism (revised edition).Richard Swinburne - 1977 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    This book investigates what it means, and whether it is coherent, to say that there is a God.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   161 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Can God's existence be disproved?J. N. Findlay - 1948 - Mind 57 (226):176-183.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • The foundations of philosophical semantics.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Princeton University Press. Edited by Lloyd Humberstone.
    Princeton University Press, 984. This book is out of print, but can be downloaded as a pdf file (3.9 MB).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy.Michael D. Beaty - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 34 (2):116-118.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle.Robert Stalnaker - 1981 - In William Leonard Harper, Robert Stalnaker & Glenn Pearce (eds.), Ifs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 87-104.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   163 citations  
  • Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation.Alfred J. Freddoso - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
    According to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation, the Son of God is truly but only contingently a human being. But is it also the case that Christ’s individual human nature is only contingently united to a divine person? The affirmative answer to this question, explicitly espoused by Duns Scotus and William of Ockham, turns out to be philosophically untenable, while the negative answer, which is arguably implicit in St. Thomas Aquinas, explication of the Incarnation, has some surprising and significant (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations