Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.Joan Acker - 1990 - Gender and Society 4 (2):139-158.
    In spite of feminist recognition that hierarchical organizations are an important location of male dominance, most feminists writing about organizations assume that organizational structure is gender neutral. This article argues that organizational structure is not gender neutral; on the contrary, assumptions about gender underlie the documents and contracts used to construct organizations and to provide the commonsense ground for theorizing about them. Their gendered nature is partly masked through obscuring the embodied nature of work.jobs and hierarchies, common concepts in organizational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   185 citations  
  • [Book review] when and where I enter, the impact of Black women on race and sex in America. [REVIEW]Paula Giddings - 1989 - Feminist Studies 15:573-590.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective.Mignon Duffy - 2007 - Gender and Society 21 (3):313-336.
    The concept of reproductive labor is central to an analysis of gender inequality, including understanding the devaluation of cleaning, cooking, child care, and other “women's work” in the paid labor force. This article presents historical census data that detail transformations of paid reproductive labor during the twentieth century. Changes in the organization of cooking and cleaning tasks in the paid labor market have led to shifts in the demographics of workers engaged in these tasks. As the context for cleaning and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Lives at the center of the periphery, lives at the periphery of the center: Chinese american masculinities and bargaining with hegemony.Anthony S. Chen - 1999 - Gender and Society 13 (5):584-607.
    A decade ago, the “new sociology of masculinity” emerged as an exciting new paradigm for understanding gender, emphasizing the study of “hegemonic power relations” among men and women. However, subsequent research has not fully redeemed the promise of the NSM, failing to seriously engage the theoretical implications of studying hegemony. This article addresses the lacunae by presenting a theoretically informed analysis of life history interviews with Chinese American men. Its chief empirical question is how Chinese American men “achieve” masculinity in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations