Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology.Gary E. Marchant & Douglas J. Sylvester - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):714-725.
    There is much we do not know about nanotechnology. Despite its tremendous promise, nanotechnology today is mostly forecast and fervent hope. Predictions that spending on nanotechnology will increase from current levels of $13 billion to more than $1 trillion by 2015 are no more than that – simply predictions. Hopes that nanotechnology will be an essential part of solving the globe's energy, food, and water problems should be tempered by recalling a century of revolutionary technologies that failed to live up (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Gene Therapy Death.Joanne Silberner - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 30 (2):6-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Gene Therapy in the Post-Gelsinger Era.Lynn Smith & Jacqueline Fowler Byers - 2002 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 4 (4):104-110.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)A Gene Therapy Death.Joanne Silberner - 2000 - Hastings Center Report 30 (2):6-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Ban Cloning? Why NBAC Is Wrong.Susan M. Wolf - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (5):12-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers.Sheila Jasanoff - 1990 - Harvard Univ Press.
    These are just some of the many controversial and timely questions that Sheila Jasanoff asks in this study of the way science advisers shape federal policy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   161 citations  
  • RAC Oversight of Gene Transfer Research: A Model Worth Extending?Nancy M. P. King - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):381-389.
    Clinical gene transfer research has both a unique history and a complex and layered system of research oversight, featuring a unique review body, the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. This paper briefly describes the process of decision-making about clinical GTR, considers whether the questions, problems, and issues raised in clinical GTR are unique, and concludes by examining whether the RAC's oversight is a useful model that should be reproduced for other similar areas of clinical research.Clinical GTR is governed by the same (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Developing U.S. Oversight Strategies for Nanobiotechnology: Learning from Past Oversight Experiences.Jordan Paradise, Susan M. Wolf, Jennifer Kuzma, Aliya Kuzhabekova, Alison W. Tisdale, Efrosini Kokkoli & Gurumurthy Ramachandran - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):688-705.
    The emergence of nanotechnology, and specifically nanobiotechnology, raises major oversight challenges. In the United States, government, industry, and researchers are debating what oversight approaches are most appropriate. Among the federal agencies already embroiled in discussion of oversight approaches are the Food and Drug Administration , Environmental Protection Agency , Department of Agriculture , Occupational Safety and Health Administration , and National Institutes of Health . All can learn from assessment of the successes and failures of past oversight efforts aimed at (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations