Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Seeking Better Health Care Outcomes: The Ethics of Using the “Nudge”.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):1-10.
    Policymakers, employers, insurance companies, researchers, and health care providers have developed an increasing interest in using principles from behavioral economics and psychology to persuade people to change their health-related behaviors, lifestyles, and habits. In this article, we examine how principles from behavioral economics and psychology are being used to nudge people (the public, patients, or health care providers) toward particular decisions or behaviors related to health or health care, and we identify the ethically relevant dimensions that should be considered for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine.Henry Aranow, Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler & William J. Winslade - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (1):32.
    Book reviewed in this article: Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. By Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler, and William J. Winslade.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • Providing Subsidies and Incentives for Norplant, Sterilization and other Contraception: Allowing Economic Theory to Inform Ethical Analysis.Jane Gilbert Mauldon - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):351-364.
    Policymakers use financial incentives to achieve a wide variety of public objectives, from pollution reduction to the employment of welfare recipients. Combining insights from economic theory with lessons learned from actual implementation, this article analyzes the implications of two such policies: first, subsidizing contraception, and second, offering financial incentives to individuals for sterilization or for using a long-term, semipermanent method of contraception such as the Intra-Uterine Device, Depo-Provera or Norplant. These subsidy and incentive policies achieve their goals through a myriad (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • NorPlant and Irresponsible Reproduction.John A. Robertson - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (1):23-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Minors' Rights in Medical Decision Making.Kathryn Hickey - 2007 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 9 (3):100-104.
    o privacy regarding family matters, common law rule, and a general presumption that parents or guardians will act in the best interest of their incompetent child. However, over the years, the courts have gradually recognized that children younger than 18 years who show maturity and competence deserve a voice in determining their course of medical treatment. This article will explore the rights and interests of minors, parents, and the state in medical decision making and will address implications for nursing administrators (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations