Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian J. Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   209 citations  
  • A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.John M. Pearce - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (1):61-73.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis?Alan Yuille & Daniel Kersten - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (7):301-308.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   92 citations  
  • Attention alters appearance.Marisa Carrasco, Sam Ling & Sarah Read - 2004 - Nature Neuroscience 7 (3):308-13.
    Does attention alter appearance? This critical issue, debated for over a century, remains unsettled. From psychophysical evidence that covert attention affects early vision-it enhances contrast sensitivity and spatial resolution-and from neurophysiological evidence that attention increases the neuronal contrast sensitivity (contrast gain), one could infer that attention changes stimulus appearance. Surprisingly, few studies have directly investigated this issue. Here we developed a psychophysical method to directly assess the phenomenological correlates of attention in humans. We show that attention alters appearance; it boosts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   128 citations  
  • Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance.K. A. Schneider & M. Komlos - 2008 - Journal of Vision 8 (15):1-10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.Anthony G. Greenwald - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (2):73-99.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   74 citations  
  • Is It What You Do, or When You Do It? The Roles of Contingency and Similarity in Pro‐Social Effects of Imitation.Caroline Catmur & Cecilia Heyes - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (8):1541-1552.
    Being imitated has a wide range of pro-social effects, but it is not clear how these effects are mediated. Naturalistic studies of the effects of being imitated have not established whether pro-social outcomes are due to the similarity and/or the contingency between the movements performed by the actor and those of the imitator. Similarity is often assumed to be the active ingredient, but we hypothesized that contingency might also be important, as it produces positive affect in infants and can be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations