Results for 'altmetrics'

Order:
  1.  36
    Understanding the Impact of Current Trends, Challenges, and Technological Advances on Scholarly Publications.Yusuf Muhammed Durna, Mustafa Said Tekin & İlhan Bahşi - 2024 - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 35 (7):2200-2201.
    To the Editor: In the rapidly changing world of scientific publication, the new system is complex, and there are many changes.1 Many variables, such as current trends, challenges, and technological developments, lead to various changes in the processes or contents of scientific publications. Understanding these changes is crucial for academic productivity. In contrast, some of these changes may have positive effects, while others may have negative effects. -/- In this context, in this letter, we wanted to emphasize the need to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Characteristics of Retracted Publications From Kazakhstan: An Analysis Using the Retraction Watch Database.Burhan Fatih Kocyigit, Alikhan Zhaksylyk, Ahmet Akyol & Marlen Yessirkepov - 2023 - Journal of Korean Medical Science 38 (46):e390.
    Background -/- Retraction is a correction process for the scientific literature that acts as a barrier to the dissemination of articles that have serious faults or misleading data. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of retracted papers from Kazakhstan. Methods -/- Utilizing data from Retraction Watch, this cross-sectional descriptive analysis documented all retracted papers from Kazakhstan without regard to publication dates. The following data were recorded: publication title, DOI number, number of authors, publication date, retraction date, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. The public relevance of philosophy.Stijn Conix, Olivier Lemeire & Pei-Shan Chi - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-28.
    Various authors have recently expressed doubts about the public relevance of philosophy. These doubts target both academic philosophy in general and particular subfields of philosophy. This paper investigates whether these doubts are justified through two tests in which the lack of public relevance of a philosophical paper is operationalized as the degree to which that paper is isolated. Both tests suggest that academic philosophy in general is more isolated from the broader public than it should be, and confirm the hypothesis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation