The concept of bribery is important to our thinking about ethics, especially in professional contexts. This is in no small part due to the thought that, as Seamus Miller has put it, bribery is “a paradigm of corruption”. Business persons and corporate entities are often evaluated by how well they remain free from, root out, and punish corruption – especially in democratic societies. It is a common thought, for example, that a democratic institution ought to be free from corruption. Since (...) bribery is often thought a form – perhaps the paradigmatic form – of corruption, bribery, too, serves as a central concept in our evaluations of business persons and corporate entities. This article will lay out three common elements which together are characteristics of bribery (payment, intention, and wrongdoing), and then briefly illustrate how this conjunction of elements allows for distinguishing between bribery and two other questionable acts often examined in the context of business (grease payment and extortion). (shrink)

Charge card extortion is a difficult issue in monetary administrations. Billions of dollars are lost because of charge card misrepresentation consistently. There is an absence of research concentrates on dissecting true Mastercard information attributable to classification issues. In this paper, AI calculations are utilized to identify charge card misrepresentation. Standard models are utilized. At that point, hybrid techniques which use AdaBoost and Majority Voting are applied. To assess the model viability, a freely accessible charge card informational collection is utilized. (...) At that point, a true charge card informational index from a budgetary organization is investigated. Moreover, noise is added to the information tests to additionally survey the heartiness of the calculations. The exploratory outcomes decidedly demonstrate that the dominant part casting a ballot technique accomplishes great exactness rates in recognizing misrepresentation cases in chargecards. (shrink)

Most people are completely oblivious to the danger that their medical data undergoes as soon as it goes out into the burgeoning world of big data. Medical data is financially valuable, and your sensitive data may be shared or sold by doctors, hospitals, clinical laboratories, and pharmacies—without your knowledge or consent. Medical data can also be found in your browsing history, the smartphone applications you use, data from wearables, your shopping list, and more. At best, data about your health might (...) end up in the hands of researchers on whose good will we depend to avoid abuses of power.2 Most likely, it will end up with data brokers who might sell it to a future employer, or an insurance company, or the government. At worst, your medical data may end up in the hands of criminals eager to commit extortion or identity theft. In addition to data harms related to exposure and discrimination, the collection of sensitive data by powerful corporations risks the creation of data monopolies that can dominate and condition access to health care. -/- This chapter aims to explore the challenge that big data brings to medical privacy. Section I offers a brief overview of the role of privacy in medical settings. I define privacy as having one’s personal information and one’s personal sensorial space (what I call autotopos) unaccessed. Section II discusses how the challenge of big data differs from other risks to medical privacy. Section III is about what can be done to minimise those risks. I argue that the most effective way of protecting people from suffering unfair medical consequences is by having a public universal healthcare system in which coverage is not influenced by personal data (e.g., genetic predisposition, exercise habits, eating habits, etc.). (shrink)

The way that George Kelly treats moving from an act of love to an act of hate, via his formulation of the construct of hostility, may indicate how far apart Kelly’s model and embodied intersubjective approaches stand concerning the issue of the fundamental integrity of experiencing. All feeling and emotion for Kelly expresses an awareness of the relative ongoing success or failure in relating new events to one’s outlook. But his definition of hostility stands out from his account of guilt, (...) anxiety, fear and threat in that it consists of a two-stage process. -/- Kelly defines hostility as “the continued effort to extort validational evidence in favor of a type of social prediction which has already proved itself a failure.” -/- Notice that this definition combines awareness of a validational event(invalidation) with a response to that event(extortion of evidence). Furthermore, as we will see, the way in which the first step is understood determines the sense of the second step, and vice versa. The crucial importance of interpretation in fathoming what Kelly meant by hostility can be demonstrated in the following questions: -/- How far-reaching did he mean his definition to be? Is hostility the same thing as anger, and if so, is there such a thing as healthy, adaptive, anger, or do all forms of anger extort evidence? And what about subtle forms of affective perturbation like irritation and annoyance? Are these also forms of hostility? (shrink)

The question of colonialism has been a deteriorating phenomenon in African history. Frantz Fanon conceived colonialism as a form of domination with the goal redefining the reality of the world of indigenous (“native”) peoples, which he considered possible through the means of violence. His conception of colonialism is that which with no doubt is embedded in vices and nothing more irrespective of the claims of the colonial masters that they aim at civilizing the people of Africa. Exploitation, extortion, economic (...) stagnancy, regression, and many more vices were all recorded as effects of colonialism. It involves the domination of a set of people in their society by different people known as settlers from another society, promoting class distinction and dehumanization. In a bid to evaluate its effect and impact both on the dominated society and the settlers’ society (nation), Fanon also enters into the discussion as he criticizes the idea of colonialism from his perspective, thereby accentuating possible solutions. This work thereby exposes Fanon’s critique of colonialism, and its’ possible effects if and when followed as proposed by the colonial masters. Using Conceptual and critical analysis, this paper argues that Fanon’s revolutionary model must be reassessed, as contemporary struggles for liberation demand more than armed resistance considering the shift in realities. (shrink)

Özet -/- Bu çalışmada modern endüstri toplumlarında teknolojinin, bireylerin ve bir bütün olarak toplumun rasyonalitesini nasıl etkilediği ve bunun da ötesinde nasıl belirlediği incelenecektir. Bu inceleme Herbert Marcuse’nin Tek Boyutlu İnsan adlı eserinde ortaya koyduğu teknolojiye ilişkin görüşleri üzerinden yapılacaktır. Rasyonalite, bilgi ve deneyim arasındaki ilişki teknoloji üzerinden irdelenecek ve daha sonra Marcuse’nin ‘teknolojik rasyonalite’ kavramı Claus Offe’nin eleştirileri bağlamında çözümlenecektir. Son olarak Marcuse’nin teknoloji eleştirisi günümüzde ortaya çıkan toplumsal pratiklerle ele alınarak değerlendirilecektir. -/- Anahtar Terimler Teknoloji, Bilgi, Eleştiri, Pratik, (...) Kapitalist Toplum, Politika, Rasyonalite. -/- Rationality, Experience and Knowledge in the Age of Technology: Problems & Criticisms -/- Abstract -/- The question of how human potential is imprisoned in contemporary capitalism is one of the central topics of the analysis on social reality by every social theory which claims to be critical. This question which can be concretized as a systematic occupation with the cultural-technical forms which caused by contemporary capitalism and as an analysis of new types of social subjectivity which emerge as a result of these forms, essentially includes the effort to specify at what level and by using what kind of tools the current system grabs the individual by the throat. Frankfurt School tradition as one of the foremost traditions which conducts such an investigation, discusses the analysis of society over fragility of the bourgeois individual. -/- According to Frankfurt School, the individual in contemporary capitalism is extorted from bourgeois ideals and is out of breath as a result of blockade of overgrown structures in social context in which s/he lives. In other words, the bourgeois individual has been erased. In the late capitalist society where personal histories are melted away, technological progress is one of the processes that led to the deletion of the individual. The clearest expression of this emphasis finds correspondence in the introduction of Herbert Marcuse's One Dimensional Man. Marcuse proposes two opposite theses in this work which he examines advanced industrial societies: 1) Advanced industrial society have a structure that it can control the qualitative changes in predictable future, 2) However, trends and forces which can reverse this situation (which can break this limitation and destroy capitalist society) also exist. First one claims that relations of domination in the social structures are sustainable in the future; and the other thesis emphasizes that the opportunity of emancipation of people by getting free of these power relations is still possible. However, Marcuse does not dwell on too much on the latter (which is the claim about possibility of powers and trends that can change the current situation). Moreover it could be argued that his arguments relating to technological rationality and one-dimensionality draws us into the impossibility of attaining any moment of a positive social transformation. -/- The book is dominated by an atmosphere of immense feeling of being encircled and hopelessness, thus it follows from the work of Marcuse that in the system that we live in it is even impossible to breathe freely. Although in follow-up studies after the One Dimensional Man (especially in writings in which vitality of 68 movement and the axis of New Left), it can be observed that there is an attempt to convert despair into hope, it is clear that Marcuse’s designations regarding technological life mechanisms should be discussed again given the technological advancements of our times. Within this context, in the study, how the technology affects and furthermore determines the individuals and society as a whole in the modern industrial societies has been investigated. This investigation has been carried out through Herbert Marcuse's views on technology which are presented in his work One-Dimensional Man. The relationship between rationality, knowledge and experience has been examined on the basis of technology, and then Marcuse's concept of ‘technological rationality’ has been analysed in the context of Claus Offe's criticisms. -/- Finally, Marcuse's critique of technology has been assessed by considering the emerging social practices in this day and time. Herbert Marcuse refers to the rationality which is created by technology and is directly based on submissive efficiency, as ‘technological rationality’. Thinker argues that what is considered to be rational in a society is subject to change with technological developments, and social rationality is directly connected to the technological advancements. There are three different projections of technological rationality approach which are in turn ontological, epistemological and ethicalpolitical approaches. Claus Offe claims that it is possible to group these different dimensions under three theses. According to the first one; scientific rationality has become the organizational principle of domination. -/- According to Offe, in his second thesis Marcuse mentions the emergence of technology sui generis i.e. as a distinctive autonomous technological rationality. And the third thesis proceeds on the line of the argument that socialist societies are under the impact of technological rationality as well as capitalist societies. According to Offe, even though these three theses are consistent with each other, Marcuse has been violated the most fundamental principle of the Critical Theory by not offering any possibility of social transformation which are aimed at the problems of extensive manipulation and pacified existence that brought about by technological rationality. Hence although Marcuse's work is of utmost importance with regard to his analysis and the issues that he has covered, it would not be wrong to say that a problematic argument from the point of the tradition of Critical Theory has been proposed. The main reason for this is the argument which asserts that the technology turned into a mechanism of domination which is almost irreversible and unchangeable. Therefore, such mechanism does not offer any resistance point where human can take a breath. As a result of this, emancipation which is the main political purpose of the Critical Theory has been invalidated. What could be the problems which are created by the negative situation that results from Marcuse's thesis on technology? For instance, how could the basis for the existence of opposing movements which are organized over the internet or the foundations of anti-capitalist radical critique be explained on the axis of Marcuse’s thesis? -/- There is a fundamental problem that has to be solved: if we declare only the validity of oppressive, central and ideological functions of technological devices, then the idea which is referred by authoritarian governments that current opposing movements or rebel groups organized over internet might be organized from a centre which is defined as imperialist power or external power becomes an affirmable argument. In other words, does Marcuse's technological determinist approach serves to legitimize the discourses such as "foreign powers or imperialist enemies," and so on which authoritarian powers frequently resort to. Is it possible to think of another alternative with regard to the problems produced by this rationality apart from the negative comments that revealed by the concept of technological rationality. From what frameworks this question can be answered In the conclusion of the study, answers to these questions have been searched. -/- Keywords: Technology, Knowledge, Criticism, Practice, Capitalist Society, Politics, Rationality. (shrink)

The internet has made the world more linked than ever before. While taking advantage of this online transition, cybercriminals target flaws in online systems, networks, and infrastructure. Businesses, government organizations, people, and communities all across the world, particularly in African countries, are all severely impacted on an economic and social level. Many African countries focused more on developing secure electricity and internet networks; yet, cybersecurity usually receives less attention than it should. One of Africa's major issues is the lack of (...) adequate digital security infrastructure, which has harmed businesses, governmental institutions, and individual communities more than it has helped. The majority of African countries operate without cybersecurity measures in place to combat cyberattacks. Only a few examples of today's cyber risks include digital extortion, business email intrusion, data breaches, online fraud, ransomware, and phishing, and new types of cybercrime are always developing. Due to the advent of new technology, cybercriminals have become more organized and quicker in their attacks and alliance creation. To maintain a secure digital environment for all internet users, this study focused on the challenges, solutions, and need for African countries to improve their online safety by tackling cybercrime, online fraud, and cybersecurity concerns. The objective of this study is to offer practical and long-term answers to the problems posed by cybercrime, with a continuing emphasis on enhancing online safety. It will assess the effectiveness of cutting-edge cybersecurity measures, legislative frameworks, and cross-border cooperative efforts, as well as potential areas for improvement. Additionally, the study will examine cutting-edge methods like blockchain technology, machine learning, and other cutting-edge methods that could improve our using digital defences to stop cybercrime. (shrink)

-/- The End of Crime Syndicates: How the Universal Formula Will Reshape Society -/- Introduction -/- Crime syndicates have existed throughout human history, thriving on corruption, ignorance, and economic imbalance. Despite law enforcement efforts, they continue to evolve and adapt, making them seemingly indestructible. However, with the full implementation of the universal formula, the mechanisms that sustain crime syndicates will be dismantled. The universal formula, as the most powerful tool in mind programming, has the potential to eradicate criminal organizations by (...) reprogramming society to function in perfect alignment with natural laws. This essay explores how the universal formula will systematically eliminate crime syndicates and create a self-correcting, balanced civilization. -/- The Root Causes of Crime Syndicates -/- Before understanding how crime syndicates will disappear, it is essential to recognize why they exist: -/- 1. Ignorance and False Beliefs – Many people engage in crime because they lack a proper understanding of ethics, justice, and balance. Misinformation, emotional manipulation, and a lack of critical thinking allow crime to flourish. -/- 2. Corruption in Leadership – Governments, law enforcement, and businesses often protect crime syndicates due to bribery, personal interests, or threats. When leaders operate without a guiding universal principle, they become vulnerable to corruption. -/- 3. Economic Imbalances – Poverty, lack of opportunity, and wealth inequality push individuals into criminal activities. Crime becomes a survival mechanism in a world that does not provide balanced opportunities. -/- 4. Social Acceptance and Demand – Society plays a role in sustaining crime by consuming illegal goods and services, whether drugs, human trafficking, or underground markets. The demand fuels the supply. -/- 5. Lack of a Self-Correcting System – Current systems of justice react after crime has been committed instead of preventing it at its root cause. There is no universal guiding principle that ensures balance in all aspects of decision-making. -/- How the Universal Formula Will Eliminate Crime Syndicates -/- The universal formula will solve these problems by reprogramming the way society functions at every level. -/- 1. Mind Reprogramming Through Education -/- The most powerful transformation will happen through education. The universal formula will be implemented in basic education worldwide, ensuring that all individuals develop a deep understanding of balance, natural laws, and ethical decision-making. This will: -/- Remove ignorance and false beliefs, making it impossible for individuals to justify crime. -/- Train people in critical thinking, making them immune to manipulation and deception by crime syndicates. -/- Reprogram individuals to see justice and balance as the only rational way to operate in society. -/- As a result, future generations will reject crime as a viable option because their minds will be structured to seek equilibrium in all aspects of life. -/- 2. Corruption Becomes Impossible in Governance -/- With the universal formula guiding leadership training, all government officials, law enforcement officers, and judges will be required to follow natural laws of balance. This will make: -/- Bribery and extortion impossible, as leaders will be programmed to always seek universal balance. -/- Laws and policies aligned with natural laws, ensuring that no loopholes exist for crime syndicates to exploit. -/- Justice systems proactive, not reactive, eliminating crime before it takes root. -/- Without political and legal protection, crime syndicates will lose their power and collapse. -/- 3. Economic Balance Will Remove the Need for Crime -/- One of the biggest reasons crime syndicates exist is economic inequality. The universal formula will: -/- Ensure fair economic distribution, so individuals no longer need to turn to crime for survival. -/- Regulate business and trade using natural balance principles, eliminating black markets. -/- Remove the root cause of wealth-based crime, such as extortion and money laundering. -/- By balancing wealth, opportunity, and resources, crime will become economically illogical and unnecessary. -/- 4. No Demand for Criminal Markets -/- The universal formula will also remove the demand for illegal goods and services by: -/- Reprogramming individuals to reject harmful behaviors such as drug use and human exploitation. -/- Creating a society where needs are met ethically, removing the desire for black market solutions. -/- Using feedback mechanisms to detect and eliminate imbalances before they grow into full-scale criminal operations. -/- Without customers, crime syndicates will have no business model, forcing them into extinction. -/- 5. Self-Correcting Societies and AI Enforcement -/- A society governed by the universal formula will have a built-in self-correcting mechanism. Since all human decision-making follows natural balance, individuals and communities will: -/- Detect and eliminate imbalances before they lead to organized crime. -/- Hold each other accountable through collective awareness. -/- Use AGI technology programmed with the universal formula to analyze all societal systems, ensuring that no criminal organizations can form or sustain themselves. -/- With AI acting as an analytical enforcer, crime syndicates will have nowhere to hide, and any criminal attempts will be immediately corrected. -/- Final Outcome: A World Without Crime Syndicates -/- Once the universal formula is fully implemented, crime syndicates will no longer be sustainable. They rely on ignorance, corruption, economic imbalances, and public demand—all of which will be eliminated under a balanced system of natural laws. -/- 1. Future generations will be programmed for ethical and rational decision-making. -/- 2. Governments will be incorruptible and operate based on natural balance. -/- 3. Economic structures will remove incentives for crime. -/- 4. Society will self-regulate against criminal behavior. -/- 5. AI will ensure that all systems remain in universal balance, preventing crime from emerging. -/- In this world, crime syndicates will have no space to exist, making them extinct. -/- Conclusion -/- Crime syndicates have survived for centuries by exploiting human ignorance, economic instability, and corruption. However, with the universal formula, these root causes will be eliminated, leading to a fully balanced society. Education, governance, economy, and technology will all operate under natural laws, ensuring that crime syndicates can never return. -/- The universal formula is the most powerful tool in mind programming, and once implemented, it will create a world where crime is not just discouraged—but fundamentally impossible. -/- . (shrink)

This work establishes that the primary justification for the state is its role as the guarantor of last resort of the personal safety, liberty and property of the citizens. The essay upholds that the state exists fundamentally for the protection of life and property and ensuring the wellbeing of the citizens and unless it performs this basic function it has no reason to exist. The essay equally establishes that no other time since the civil war era has Nigeria's state been (...) seriously engulfed in perennial security challenges than now. It is the stand of this essay that the current trend of violence imprints on the psyche of Nigerians that the government security apparatus is incapable of guaranteeing the security, safety and wellbeing of the people. It is the candid opinion of this essay that the paradox of Nigeria's state security is that instead of the state being a framework of lawful order and the highest source of authority, it now constitutes the greatest threat to itself. The essay submits that peaceful protest is against the ruling elite that has exploited and appropriated the collective patrimony to itself. It substantiates the legality of EndSARS Protest necessitated by the improprieties of the unit of Nigeria Police Force – Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) against human rights violation, extortion, torture brutality and extra-judicial killings by SARS due to sustained years of leadership deficit in Nigeria. The protest though hijacked by hoodlums is a wake-up call for articulation of good leadership and governance in Nigeria. The Essay adopts an expository and critical evaluation method to drive home its aims and objectives. It relies on se. (shrink)

: Ransomware remains one of the most significant cybersecurity threats, evolving rapidly with new attack vectors, encryption techniques, and extortion models. As we enter 2018, ransomware attacks have become more sophisticated, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI), automation, and emerging technologies to bypass traditional security measures. This paper analyzes the latest ransomware trends, including targeted attacks on critical infrastructure, Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), and double/triple extortion tactics. Additionally, it explores advanced mitigation techniques such as AI-driven anomaly detection, zero-trust architectures, blockchain-based security solutions, (...) and proactive threat intelligence frameworks. By examining real-world case studies and industry best practices, this study provides insights into effective countermeasures and future directions for securing digital ecosystems against ransomware threats. The findings aim to assist cybersecurity professionals, policymakers, and organizations in strengthening their defense mechanisms against evolving ransomware threats in 2018 and beyond. (shrink)

The practices of using hostages to obtain concessions and using human shields to deter aggression share an important characteristic which warrants a univocal reference to both sorts of conduct: they both involve manipulating our commitment to morality, as a means to achieving wrongful ends. I call this type of conduct “moral coercion”. In this paper I (a) present an account of moral coercion by linking it to coercion more generally, (b) determine whether and to what degree the coerced agent is (...) liable for the harms resulting from acceding to moral coercion, and (c) investigate factors relevant to determining whether we ought to accede to moral coercion. In so doing, I provide grounds for the intuition that we “allow evil to succeed” when we accede to moral coercion. (shrink)

Disclosure of true but reputation-damaging information is generally legal. But threats to disclose true but reputation-damaging information unless payment is made are generally criminal. Many scholars think that this situation is paradoxical because it seems to involve illegality mysteriously arising out of legality, a criminal act mysteriously arising out of an independently legal threat to disclose conjoined with an independently legal demand for money. -/- But this formulation is not quite right. The real paradox raised by the different legal statuses (...) of blackmail threats to disclose and disclosure itself involves a contradiction between our strong intuition that blackmail threats should be criminal and some equally strong arguments, all of which depend on the fact that disclosure is legal, that blackmail threats should be legal. So an adequate solution to the real Blackmail Paradox requires us either to drop the intuition or to refute the pro-legalization arguments. -/- This Article will adopt the latter approach. It will explain why the six main arguments for legalizing blackmail threats all fail. In the course of refuting one of these arguments, it will also offer a novel positive justification for criminalizing blackmail threats: they should be criminal for the same reason that menacing, harassment, and stalking are criminal--namely, because they involve the reasonable likelihood, and usually the intent, of putting the victim into a state of especially great fear and anxiety. -/- Of course, one might object that disclosure itself is likely to have the same effect, if not malicious purpose. Yet, again, it is still legal. But this point shows only that we as a society value freedom of speech more than we value freedom from infliction of emotional injury. It does not show that we do not value freedom from infliction of emotional injury sufficiently to protect it when competing moral or institutional interests such as freedom of speech are not at stake. (shrink)