Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Procedure of Morality.Ori Herstein & Ofer Malcai - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27 (1).
    Does morality have a procedure? Unlike law, morality is arguably neither posited nor institutional. Thus, while morality undeniably prescribes various procedures, that morality itself has a procedure is less obvious. Indeed, the coexistence of procedural moral norms alongside substantive moral norms might seem paradoxical, given that they often yield contradictory prescriptions. After all, one may wonder, is morality not substantive all the way down? Nevertheless, the paper argues that morality has a “procedural branch” containing numerous norms that are themselves procedural. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Refugee Rights: Against Expanding the Definition of a “Refugee” and Unilateral Protection Elsewhere.Max Cherem - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (2):183-205.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Procedural Protections, Appeal Arrangements, and Welfare Conditionality.Cristian Pérez-Muñoz - 2023 - Public Affairs Quarterly 37 (2):101-124.
    Welfare conditionality (WC) is a crucial ingredient of social policies around the world. Welfare conditionality demands that recipients meet specific behavioral goals to either access the benefit for the first time or retain the benefit's ongoing advantages. This article argues that any justification of WC must seriously consider procedural protections (PPs) and how they shape the policy's outcome. Procedural protections are institutional principles and mechanisms that guarantee fairness in the administrative decision-making process. This essay normatively evaluates appeal procedures—a key component (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Procedural justice and the law.Denise Meyerson & Catriona Mackenzie - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (12):e12548.
    This article considers procedural justice in the law, with specific reference to the adjudicative context of governmental officials applying legal standards to particular cases. We critically survey the three main accounts of procedural justice in the literature: utilitarian, outcome‐based, and dignitarian. Utilitarian and outcome‐based theories share the instrumental view that the only purpose of procedures is to lead to accurate legal outcomes. However, the former are willing to trade off the benefits of accuracy against its costs, whereas the latter hold (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation