Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Direct and local definitions of the Turing jump.Richard A. Shore - 2007 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 7 (2):229-262.
    We show that there are Π5 formulas in the language of the Turing degrees, [Formula: see text], with ≤, ∨ and ∧, that define the relations x″ ≤ y″, x″ = y″ and so {x ∈ L2 = x ≥ y|x″ = y″} in any jump ideal containing 0. There are also Σ6&Π6 and Π8 formulas that define the relations w = x″ and w = x', respectively, in any such ideal [Formula: see text]. In the language with just ≤ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Every 1-Generic Computes a Properly 1-Generic.Barbara F. Csima, Rod Downey, Noam Greenberg, Denis R. Hirschfeldt & Joseph S. Miller - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1385 - 1393.
    A real is called properly n-generic if it is n-generic but not n+1-generic. We show that every 1-generic real computes a properly 1-generic real. On the other hand, if m > n ≥ 2 then an m-generic real cannot compute a properly n-generic real.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Turing degrees below generics and randoms.Richard A. Shore - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (1):171-178.
    If X0and X1are both generic, the theories of the degrees below X0and X1are the same. The same is true if both are random. We show that then-genericity orn-randomness of X do not suffice to guarantee that the degrees below X have these common theories. We also show that these two theories are different. These results answer questions of Jockusch as well as Barmpalias, Day and Lewis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark