Switch to: References

Citations of:

Nicomachean ethics VII. 14 (1154a22-b34) : the pain of the living and divine pleasure

In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics. New York: Oxford University Press (2009)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Aristotle and Eudoxus on the Argument from Contraries.Wei Cheng - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (4):588-618.
    The debate over the value of pleasure among Eudoxus, Speusippus, and Aristotle is dramatically documented by the Nicomachean Ethics, particularly in the dialectical pros-and-cons concerning the so-called argument from contraries. Two similar versions of this argument are preserved at EN VII. 13, 1153b1–4, and X. 2, 1172b18–20. Many scholars believe that the argument at EN VII is either a report or an appropriation of the Eudoxean argument in EN X. This essay aims to revise this received view. It will explain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • As Duas Definições de Prazer na Ética Nicomaqueia de Aristóteles.Juliana Ortegosa Aggio - 2018 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 12 (2):43-73.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Middle Included - Logos in Aristotle.Ömer Aygün - 2016 - Evanston, Illinois, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Northwestern University Press.
    The Middle Included is a systematic exploration of the meanings of logos throughout Aristotle’s work. It claims that the basic meaning is “gathering,” a relation that holds its terms together without isolating them or collapsing one to the other. This meaning also applies to logos in the sense of human language. Aristotle describes how some animals are capable of understanding non-firsthand experience without being able to relay it, while others relay it without understanding. Aygün argues that what distinguishes human language, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation