Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Non-principal ultrafilters, program extraction and higher-order reverse mathematics.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2012 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):1250002-.
    We investigate the strength of the existence of a non-principal ultrafilter over fragments of higher-order arithmetic. Let [Formula: see text] be the statement that a non-principal ultrafilter on ℕ exists and let [Formula: see text] be the higher-order extension of ACA0. We show that [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-conservative over [Formula: see text] and thus that [Formula: see text] is conservative over PA. Moreover, we provide a program extraction method and show that from a proof of a strictly (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The open and clopen Ramsey theorems in the Weihrauch lattice.Alberto Marcone & Manlio Valenti - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (1):316-351.
    We investigate the uniform computational content of the open and clopen Ramsey theorems in the Weihrauch lattice. While they are known to be equivalent to $\mathrm {ATR_0}$ from the point of view of reverse mathematics, there is not a canonical way to phrase them as multivalued functions. We identify eight different multivalued functions and study their degree from the point of view of Weihrauch, strong Weihrauch, and arithmetic Weihrauch reducibility. In particular one of our functions turns out to be strictly (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • $${\Pi^1_2}$$ -comprehension and the property of Ramsey.Christoph Heinatsch - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (3-4):323-386.
    We show that a theory of autonomous iterated Ramseyness based on second order arithmetic (SOA) is proof-theoretically equivalent to ${\Pi^1_2}$ -comprehension. The property of Ramsey is defined as follows. Let X be a set of real numbers, i.e. a set of infinite sets of natural numbers. We call a set H of natural numbers homogeneous for X if either all infinite subsets of H are in X or all infinite subsets of H are not in X. X has the property (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Bases and borel selectors for tall families.Jan Grebík & Carlos Uzcátegui - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (1):359-375.
    Given a family${\cal C}$of infinite subsets of${\Bbb N}$, we study when there is a Borel function$S:2^{\Bbb N} \to 2^{\Bbb N} $such that for every infinite$x \in 2^{\Bbb N} $,$S\left \in {\Cal C}$and$S\left \subseteq x$. We show that the family of homogeneous sets as given by the Nash-Williams’ theorem admits such a Borel selector. However, we also show that the analogous result for Galvin’s lemma is not true by proving that there is an$F_\sigma $tall ideal on${\Bbb N}$without a Borel selector. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ultrafilters in reverse mathematics.Henry Towsner - 2014 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 14 (1):1450001.
    We extend theories of reverse mathematics by a non-principal ultrafilter, and show that these are conservative extensions of the usual theories ACA0, ATR0, and [Formula: see text].
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Hindman's theorem: An ultrafilter argument in second order arithmetic.Henry Towsner - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (1):353 - 360.
    Hindman's Theorem is a prototypical example of a combinatorial theorem with a proof that uses the topology of the ultrafilters. We show how the methods of this proof, including topological arguments about ultrafilters, can be translated into second order arithmetic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Conservativity of ultrafilters over subsystems of second order arithmetic.Antonio Montalbán & Richard A. Shore - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (2):740-765.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Partial impredicativity in reverse mathematics.Henry Towsner - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (2):459-488.
    In reverse mathematics, it is possible to have a curious situation where we know that an implication does not reverse, but appear to have no information on how to weaken the assumption while preserving the conclusion (other than reducing all the way to the tautology of assuming the conclusion). A main cause of this phenomenon is the proof of a $\Pi^1_2$ sentence from the theory $\mathbf{\Pi^{\textbf{1}}_{\textbf{1}}-CA_{\textbf{0}}}$. Using methods based on the functional interpretation, we introduce a family of weakenings of $\mathbf{\Pi^{\textbf{1}}_{\textbf{1}}-CA_{\textbf{0}}}$ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations