Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Visual attention.Marvin Chun & Jeremy Wolfe - 2001 - In E. Bruce Goldstein (ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Perception. Blackwell. pp. 2--335.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Individual differences in change blindness.Katharina Verena Bergmann - unknown
    The present work shows the existence of systematic individual differences in change blindness. It can be concluded that the sensitivity for changes is a trait. That is, persons differ in their ability to detect changes, independent from the situation or the measurement method. Moreover, there are two explanations for individual differences in change blindness: a) capacity differences in visual selective attention that may be influenced by top-down activated attention helping to focus attention onto relevant stimuli b) differences in working memory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.Paul E. Dux, Veronika Coltheart & Irina M. Harris - 2006 - Cognition 99 (3):355-383.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Preferential processing of threatening facial expressions using the repetition blindness paradigm.Loren Mowszowski, Skye McDonald, Danielle Wang & Cristina Bornhofen - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (7):1238-1255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Visual field asymmetries in object individuation.Irina M. Harris, Cara Wong & Sally Andrews - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 37:194-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.Irina M. Harris & Paul E. Dux - 2005 - Cognition 95 (1):73-93.
    The question of whether object recognition is orientation-invariant or orientation-dependent was investigated using a repetition blindness (RB) paradigm. In RB, the second occurrence of a repeated stimulus is less likely to be reported, compared to the occurrence of a different stimulus, if it occurs within a short time of the first presentation. This failure is usually interpreted as a difficulty in assigning two separate episodic tokens to the same visual type. Thus, RB can provide useful information about which representations are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Identity and similarity in repetition blindness: no cross-over interaction.Catherine L. Harris & Alison L. Morris - 2001 - Cognition 81 (1):1-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: implications for lexical processing.Doriana Chialant & Alfonso Caramazza - 1997 - Cognition 63 (1):79-119.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Repetition Blindness for Natural Images of Objects with Viewpoint Changes.Stéphane Buffat, Justin Plantier, Corinne Roumes & Jean Lorenceau - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation