Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency.Paul E. Dunne & T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 149 (2):221-250.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Propositional proofs and reductions between NP search problems.Samuel R. Buss & Alan S. Johnson - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (9):1163-1182.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Propositional proof systems based on maximum satisfiability.Maria Luisa Bonet, Sam Buss, Alexey Ignatiev, Antonio Morgado & Joao Marques-Silva - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 300 (C):103552.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Separation results for the size of constant-depth propositional proofs.Arnold Beckmann & Samuel R. Buss - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 136 (1-2):30-55.
    This paper proves exponential separations between depth d-LK and depth -LK for every utilizing the order induction principle. As a consequence, we obtain an exponential separation between depth d-LK and depth -LK for . We investigate the relationship between the sequence-size, tree-size and height of depth d-LK-derivations for , and describe transformations between them. We define a general method to lift principles requiring exponential tree-size -LK-refutations for to principles requiring exponential sequence-size d-LK-refutations, which will be described for the Ramsey principle (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On transformations of constant depth propositional proofs.Arnold Beckmann & Sam Buss - 2019 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 170 (10):1176-1187.
    This paper studies the complexity of constant depth propositional proofs in the cedent and sequent calculus. We discuss the relationships between the size of tree-like proofs, the size of dag-like proofs, and the heights of proofs. The main result is to correct a proof construction in an earlier paper about transformations from proofs with polylogarithmic height and constantly many formulas per cedent.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An exponential separation between the parity principle and the pigeonhole principle.Paul Beame & Toniann Pitassi - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 80 (3):195-228.
    The combinatorial parity principle states that there is no perfect matching on an odd number of vertices. This principle generalizes the pigeonhole principle, which states that for a fixed bipartition of the vertices, there is no perfect matching between them. Therefore, it follows from recent lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle that the parity principle requires exponential-size bounded-depth Frege proofs. Ajtai previously showed that the parity principle does not have polynomial-size bounded-depth Frege proofs even with the pigeonhole principle as an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Typical forcings, NP search problems and an extension of a theorem of Riis.Moritz Müller - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (4):102930.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Resolution over linear equations modulo two.Dmitry Itsykson & Dmitry Sokolov - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (1):102722.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark