Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Legal sentence boundary detection using hybrid deep learning and statistical models.Reshma Sheik, Sneha Rao Ganta & S. Jaya Nirmala - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-31.
    Sentence boundary detection (SBD) represents an important first step in natural language processing since accurately identifying sentence boundaries significantly impacts downstream applications. Nevertheless, detecting sentence boundaries within legal texts poses a unique and challenging problem due to their distinct structural and linguistic features. Our approach utilizes deep learning models to leverage delimiter and surrounding context information as input, enabling precise detection of sentence boundaries in English legal texts. We evaluate various deep learning models, including domain-specific transformer models like LegalBERT and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Bringing order into the realm of Transformer-based language models for artificial intelligence and law.Candida M. Greco & Andrea Tagarelli - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-148.
    Transformer-based language models (TLMs) have widely been recognized to be a cutting-edge technology for the successful development of deep-learning-based solutions to problems and applications that require natural language processing and understanding. Like for other textual domains, TLMs have indeed pushed the state-of-the-art of AI approaches for many tasks of interest in the legal domain. Despite the first Transformer model being proposed about six years ago, there has been a rapid progress of this technology at an unprecedented rate, whereby BERT and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A novel MRC framework for evidence extracts in judgment documents.Yulin Zhou, Lijuan Liu, Yanping Chen, Ruizhang Huang, Yongbin Qin & Chuan Lin - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (1):147-163.
    Evidences are important proofs to support judicial trials. Automatically extracting evidences from judgement documents can be used to assess the trial quality and support “Intelligent Court”. Current evidence extraction is primarily depended on sequence labelling models. Despite their success, they can only assign a label to a token, which is difficult to recognize nested evidence entities in judgment documents, where a token may belong to several evidences at the same time. In this paper, we present a novel evidence extraction architecture (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Self-training improves few-shot learning in legal artificial intelligence tasks.Yulin Zhou, Yongbin Qin, Ruizhang Huang, Yanping Chen, Chuan Lin & Yuan Zhou - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-17.
    As the labeling costs in legal artificial intelligence tasks are expensive. Therefore, it becomes a challenge to utilize low cost to train a robust model. In this paper, we propose a LAIAugment approach, which aims to enhance the few-shot learning capability in legal artificial intelligence tasks. Specifically, we first use the self-training approach to label the amount of unlabelled data to enhance the feature learning capability of the model. Moreover, we also search for datasets that are similar to the training (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark