Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Man Who Would Be Galt. [REVIEW]Dennis C. Hardin - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (2):161-300.
    In 1958, Nathaniel Branden founded what would become the Nathaniel Branden Institute and launched the Objectivist movement through a course of twenty lectures he called “The Basic Principles of Objectivism.” In 2009, that lecture series became a book and an important historical record. This review captures the essence of those lectures while also taking a close look at Branden’s philosophical odyssey. It attempts to recount whether and how far the man whom Ayn Rand saw as the living image of John (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues.Roger E. Bissell - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):306-320.
    The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of “dialectics,” which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • What Ayn Never Told Us. [REVIEW]Dennis C. Hardin - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (1):4-73.
    Understanding Objectivism was Leonard Peikoff’s first major teaching endeavor following Ayn Rand’s death in 1982. Like Nathaniel Branden’s 1971 book The Disowned Self—written after his break with Rand— the lectures addressed complaints reported by students of the philosophy, subject matter Rand may not have approved. Peikoff faults the common mistake of looking at Objectivism through the lens of traditional philosophy. He clarifies the distinct nature of objective methodology and shows how traditional philosophy is hostage to the pernicious mind-body dichotomy. Despite (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: The Dialectical Rand.Chris Matthew Sciabarra - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):321-357.
    Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (July 2015), and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand (2016). Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend “dialectical libertarianism,” which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation