Switch to: References

Citations of:

The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants

In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 145--176 (1996)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition.Anna Papafragou - 2002 - Cognition 84 (2):189-219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Recycling utterances: A speaker's guide to sentence processing.Ewa Dąbrowska - 2014 - Cognitive Linguistics 25 (4).
    Name der Zeitschrift: Cognitive Linguistics Jahrgang: 25 Heft: 4 Seiten: 617-653.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Knowledge as Process: Contextually Cued Attention and Early Word Learning.Linda B. Smith, Eliana Colunga & Hanako Yoshida - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (7):1287-1314.
    Learning depends on attention. The processes that cue attention in the moment dynamically integrate learned regularities and immediate contextual cues. This paper reviews the extensive literature on cued attention and attentional learning in the adult literature and proposes that these fundamental processes are likely significant mechanisms of change in cognitive development. The value of this idea is illustrated using phenomena in children's novel word learning.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Reviving Whorf: The return of linguistic relativity.Maria Francisca Reines & Jesse Prinz - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):1022-1032.
    The idea that natural languages shape the way we think in different ways was popularized by Benjamin Whorf, but then fell out of favor for lack of empirical support. But now, a new wave of research has been shifting the tide back toward linguistic relativity. The recent research can be interpreted in different ways, some trivial, some implausibly radical, and some both plausible and interesting. We introduce two theses that would have important implications if true: Habitual Whorfianism and Ontological Whorfianism. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Space Between Languages.Michele I. Feist - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (7):1177-1199.
    What aspects of spatial relations influence speakers’ choice of locative? This article presents a study of static spatial descriptions from 24 languages. The study reveals two kinds of spatial terms evident cross‐linguistically: specific spatial terms and general spatial terms (GSTs). Whereas specific spatial terms—including English prepositions—occur in a limited range of situations, with concomitant specificity in their meaning, GSTs occur in all spatial descriptions (in languages that employ them). Because of the extreme differences in range of application, the two are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time.Rafael E. Núñez & Eve Sweetser - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (3):401-450.
    Cognitive research on metaphoric concepts of time has focused on differences between moving Ego and moving time models, but even more basic is the contrast between Ego‐ and temporal‐reference‐point models. Dynamic models appear to be quasi‐universal cross‐culturally, as does the generalization that in Ego‐reference‐point models, FUTURE IS IN FRONT OF EGO and PAST IS IN BACK OF EGO. The Aymara language instead has a major static model of time wherein FUTURE IS BEHIND EGO and PAST IS IN FRONT OF EGO; (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   89 citations  
  • (1 other version)Learning to express motion events in English and korean : The influence of language specific lexicalization patterns.Soonja Choi & Melissa Bowerman - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 83-121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English.Maya Hickmann & Henriëtte Hendriks - 2010 - Cognitive Linguistics 21 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.Peggy Li & Lila Gleitman - 2002 - Cognition 83 (3):265-294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations  
  • Motion events in language and cognition.S. Gennari - 2002 - Cognition 83 (1):49-79.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions.Simon Garrod, Gillian Ferrier & Siobhan Campbell - 1999 - Cognition 72 (2):167-189.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Dynamisch Inter(-en trans)disciplinair Taal Onderzoek: De nieuwe taalwetenschappen.Nathalie Gontier & Katrien Mondt (eds.) - 2006 - Gent, België: Academia press, Ginkgo.
    Language research is currently in a state of flux. The phenomenon of language is not merely the topic of investigation in linguistics, it is examined by a multitude of scholars with different scientific backgrounds. In order to examine how these various disciplines approach language, a think-tank was founded in 2002, called DITO, Dynamisch Inter(-en trans)disciplinair onderzoek, or Dynamic Inter- (and trans)disciplinary Research. The think-tank is located at the Belgian Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Free University of Brussels). This book provides short introductory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark