Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Risk and business cycles: Reply to Rosser.Tyler Cowen - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):89-94.
    Rosser's thoughtful and careful review of my book on business cycles reflects a different methodological stance than my own. I believe that economic theory and macroeconomics cannot escape using the concept of risk, even though, as Rosser points out, risk is not a simple unidimensional magnitude in many circumstances. I view the rational expectations assumption as a useful way of presenting a theory, rather than as a descriptive account of real‐world expectations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What has been breaking U.S. Banks?Lawrence H. White - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):321-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Between Vienna and Cambridge: The risky business of new Austrian business‐cycle theory. [REVIEW]J. Barkley Rosser - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (3-4):373-389.
    Tyler Cowen's “New Austrian” theory of business cycles is based on risk analysis and the assumption of rational expectations. This contrasts with the Old Austrian view, which questions the feasibility of measuring economic risk. Despite Cowen's admirable eclecticism, the way he applies risk analysis to business cycles suffers from serious inconsistencies, and his use of rational expectations is mistaken in the face of economic complexity—a phenomenon that was accurately understood by the traditional Austrians.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations