Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Muller’s nobel prize research and peer review.Edward J. Calabrese - 2018 - Philosophy, Ethics and Humanities in Medicine 13 (1):1-6.
    This paper assesses possible reasons why Hermann J. Muller avoided peer-review of data that became the basis of his Nobel Prize award for producing gene mutations in male Drosophila by X-rays. Extensive correspondence between Muller and close associates and other materials were obtained from preserved papers to compliment extensive publications by and about Muller in the open literature. These were evaluated for potential historical insights that clarify why he avoided peer-review of his Nobel Prize findings. This paper clarifies the basis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Muller’s nobel prize research and peer review.Edward J. Calabrese - 2018 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 13 (1):6.
    This historical analysis indicates that it is highly unlikely that the Nobel Prize winning research of Hermann J. Muller was peer-reviewed. The published paper of Muller lacked a research methods section, cited no references, and failed to acknowledge and discuss the work of Gager and Blakeslee that claimed to have induced gene mutation via ionizing radiation six months prior to Muller’s non-data Science paper :84-87, 1927a). Despite being well acclimated into the scientific world of peer-review, Muller choose to avoid the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations