Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Beyond Dogmatomachy: Eric Voegelin’s Bodinian Understanding of Toleration and Symbolization.Manfred Svensson - 2021 - The European Legacy 26 (6):587-602.
    ABSTRACT Eric Voegelin’s intellectual project has typically been described as involved in the rehabilitation of classical political philosophy and in the diagnosis of Gnostic tendencies in modernity. In his work, however, he repeatedly points to the late-medieval/early modern concept of toleration as a necessary addition to the Platonic-Aristotelian legacy he was concerned with retrieving. This article explores Voegelin’s understanding of toleration, and especially its Bodinian origins. As the article demonstrates, his understanding of toleration is deeply intertwined with a Bodinian understanding (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Toleration in a new key: historical and global perspectives.Cary J. Nederman - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):349-361.
    This article challenges two dominant views of religious and cultural toleration, namely, that it is modern and that it is Western. It claims instead that both medieval Latin thought and many non-Western traditions embraced a position that coherently defends tolerance beliefs and practices. Specifically, the article identifies four approaches that clearly favour toleration: scepticism, functionalism, nationalism and mysticism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Shall We Read the History of Ethics?G. Scott Davis - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (2):417-424.
    This response suggests that in writing the history of ethics, it is important to take seriously what the principals wrote and believed, distinguishing it carefully from our own responses to their writings, or from subsequent uses to which their writings may have been put. For example, when reading Thomas Aquinas and Francisco de Vitoria on just war against non‐Christian peoples, forcible conversion and conquest are clearly condemned. Whatever the attitudes of their contemporaries, not to mention later thinkers up to the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation