Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why is Bayesian confirmation theory rarely practiced.Robert W. P. Luk - 2019 - Science and Philosophy 7 (1):3-20.
    Bayesian confirmation theory is a leading theory to decide the confirmation/refutation of a hypothesis based on probability calculus. While it may be much discussed in philosophy of science, is it actually practiced in terms of hypothesis testing by scientists? Since the assignment of some of the probabilities in the theory is open to debate and the risk of making the wrong decision is unknown, many scientists do not use the theory in hypothesis testing. Instead, they use alternative statistical tests that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Whose scientific work is it anyway? Knowledge production in the socially constructed fuzzy authorship.George Lăzăroiu - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (9):1290-1295.
    Authorship is typically employed as the supporting evidence for the assessment of research output, shaping career advancement and rewards, and constituting a highly regarded commodity in an intense...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Implications and Extensions of Luk’s Theory and Model of Scientific Study.Robert Luk - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (1):103-118.
    Recently, Luk tried to establish a model and a theory of scientific studies. He focused on articulating the theory and the model, but he did not emphasize relating them to some issues in philosophy of science. In addition, they might explain some of the issues in philosophy of science, but such explanation is not articulated in his papers. This paper explores the implications and extensions of Luk’s work in philosophy of science or science in general.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations