Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Images Cannot Be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might.Marc Champagne & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-30.
    Some have suggested that images can be arguments. Images can certainly bolster the acceptability of individual premises. We worry, though, that the static nature of images prevents them from ever playing a genuinely argumentative role. To show this, we call attention to a dilemma. The conclusion of a visual argument will either be explicit or implicit. If a visual argument includes its conclusion, then that conclusion must be demarcated from the premise or otherwise the argument will beg the question. If (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ____ is Necessary for Interpreting a Proposition.Marc Champagne - 2019 - Chinese Semiotic Studies 15 (1):39–48.
    In Natural propositions (2014), Stjernfelt contends that the interpretation of a proposition or dicisign requires the joint action of two kinds of signs. A proposition must contain a sign that conveys a general quality. This function can be served by a similarity-based icon or code-based symbol. In addition, a proposition must situate or apply this general quality, so that the predication can become liable of being true or false. This function is served by an index. Stjernfelt rightly considers the co-localization (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Recent Studies on Signs: Commentary and Perspectives.Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2015 - Sign Systems Studies 43 (4):616.
    In this commentary, I reply to the fourteen papers published in the Sign Systems Studies special issue on Peirce’s Theory of Signs, with a view on connecting some of their central themes and theses and in putting some of the key points in those papers into a wider perspective of Peirce’s logic and philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation