Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?Dovilė Barysė & Roee Sarel - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (1):117-146.
    Artificial intelligence plays an increasingly important role in legal disputes, influencing not only the reality outside the court but also the judicial decision-making process itself. While it is clear why judges may generally benefit from technology as a tool for reducing effort costs or increasing accuracy, the presence of technology in the judicial process may also affect the public perception of the courts. In particular, if individuals are averse to adjudication that involves a high degree of automation, particularly given fairness (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Danushka Bollegala - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 289 (C):103387.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A user-centered approach to developing an AI system analyzing U.S. federal court data.Rachel F. Adler, Andrew Paley, Andong L. Li Zhao, Harper Pack, Sergio Servantez, Adam R. Pah, Kristian Hammond & Scales Okn Consortium - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (3):547-570.
    We implemented a user-centered approach to the design of an artificial intelligence (AI) system that provides users with access to information about the workings of the United States federal court system regardless of their technical background. Presently, most of the records associated with the federal judiciary are provided through a federal system that does not support exploration aimed at discovering systematic patterns about court activities. In addition, many users lack the data analytical skills necessary to conduct their own analyses and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark