Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How should we ascribe the third stance?Luis Rosa - 2025 - In Verena Wagner & Zinke Alexandra (eds.), Suspension in epistemology and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Epistemologists often describe subjects as being capable of adopting a third kind of categorical doxastic stance regarding whether something is the case, besides belief and disbelief. They deploy a variety of idioms in order to ascribe that stance. In this paper, I flesh out the properties that the third kind of categorical stance is supposed to have and start searching for the best ways to ascribe it. The idioms ‘suspends judgment about whether’ and ‘is agnostic about whether’, among others, are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Radical internalism meets radical externalism or: Smithies’ epistemology transcendentalised.Tony Cheng - 2022 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):1-8.
    In The Epistemic Role of Consciousness (2019), Declan Smithies has carried out a thorough radical internalist programme. Along the way he compares and contrasts many different views, including a group he calls “radical externalism.” From the labels, it might seem that radical internalism and radical externalism must be very different in their core commitments. In this short note, I will single out a version of radical externalism – factivism, more specifically John McDowell’s version (1994, 1995, 2011) – and argue that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New Directions for Awareness Research (in epistemology).Paul Silva Jr - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark