Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Turingův test: filozofické aspekty umělé inteligence.Filip Tvrdý - 2011 - Dissertation, Palacky University
    Disertační práce se zabývá problematikou připisování myšlení jiným entitám, a to pomocí imitační hry navržené v roce 1950 britským filosofem Alanem Turingem. Jeho kritérium, známé v dějinách filosofie jako Turingův test, je podrobeno detailní analýze. Práce popisuje nejen původní námitky samotného Turinga, ale především pozdější diskuse v druhé polovině 20. století. Největší pozornost je věnována těmto kritikám: Lucasova matematická námitka využívající Gödelovu větu o neúplnosti, Searlův argument čínského pokoje konstatující nedostatečnost syntaxe pro sémantiku, Blockův návrh na použití brutální síly pro (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Menschen, maschinen und gödels theorem.Rosemarie Rheinwald - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (1):1 - 21.
    Mechanism is the thesis that men can be considered as machines, that there is no essential difference between minds and machines.John Lucas has argued that it is a consequence of Gödel's theorem that mechanism is false. Men cannot be considered as machines, because the intellectual capacities of men are superior to that of any machine. Lucas claims that we can do something that no machine can do-namely to produce as true the Gödel-formula of any given machine. But no machine can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the philosophical relevance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
    A survey of more philosophical applications of Gödel's incompleteness results.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • On the Anti-Mechanist Arguments Based on Gödel’s Theorem.Stanisław Krajewski - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):9-56.
    The alleged proof of the non-mechanical, or non-computational, character of the human mind based on Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is revisited. Its history is reviewed. The proof, also known as the Lucas argument and the Penrose argument, is refuted. It is claimed, following Gödel himself and other leading logicians, that antimechanism is not implied by Gödel’s theorems alone. The present paper sets out this refutation in its strongest form, demonstrating general theorems implying the inconsistency of Lucas’s arithmetic and the semantic inadequacy (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • On the necessary philosophical premises of the Goedelian arguments.Fano Vincenzo & Graziani Pierluigi - unknown
    Lucas-Penrose type arguments have been the focus of many papers in the literature. In the present paper we attempt to evaluate the consequences of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems for the philosophy of the mind. We argue that the best answer to this question was given by Gödel already in 1951 when he realized that either our intellectual capability is not representable by a Turing Machine, or we can never know with mathematical certainty what such a machine is. But his considerations became (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Prospects for the cyberiad: Certain limits on human self-knowledge in the cybernetic age.John Barresi - 1987 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (March):19-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • Godel's theorem and the mind.Peter Slezak - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (March):41-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations