Switch to: References

Citations of:

Cognitive activity in artificial neural networks

In Daniel N. Osherson & Edward E. Smith (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Visual cognition. 2. MIT Press. pp. 3--372 (1990)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Smoke without fire: What do virtual experiments in cognitive science really tell us?Mr Peter R. Krebs - unknown
    Many activities in Cognitive Science involve complex computer models and simulations of both theoretical and real entities. Artificial Intelligence and the study of artificial neural nets in particular, are seen as major contributors in the quest for understanding the human mind. Computational models serve as objects of experimentation, and results from these virtual experiments are tacitly included in the framework of empirical science. Simulations of cognitive functions, like learning to speak, or discovering syntactical structures in language, are the basis for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Models of memory: Wittgenstein and cognitive science.David G. Stern - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):203-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
    The distinction between rules and similarity is central to our understanding of much of cognitive psychology. Two aspects of existing research have motivated the present work. First, in different cognitive psychology areas we typically see different conceptions of rules and similarity; for example, rules in language appear to be of a different kind compared to rules in categorization. Second, rules processes are typically modeled as separate from similarity ones; for example, in a learning experiment, rules and similarity influences would be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Two types of thought: Evidence from aphasia.Jules Davidoff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):20-21.
    Evidence from aphasia is considered that leads to a distinction between abstract and concrete thought processes and hence for a distinction between rules and similarity. It is argued that perceptual classification is inherently a rule-following procedure and these rules are unable to be followed when a patient has difficulty with name comprehension and retrieval.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. [REVIEW]Mark H. Ashcraft - 1992 - Cognition 44 (1-2):75-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations