Switch to: References

Citations of:

Could a machine think?

Paul M. Churchland & Patricia S. Churchland

Scientific American 262 (1):32-37 (1990)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

J. R. Searle ve çin odası argümanı.Ferhat Onur - 2016 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 9 (1).details John R. Searle’nin Çin Odası Argümanı oldukça ilgi çekici ve üzerinde çokça tartışılmış bir argümandır. Argümanın ilgi çekiciliğini günümüzün en baskın zihin kuramlarından biri olan kompütasyonalizmi hedef almasına, üzerinde çokça tartışılmasını ise felsefi implikasyonlarının hayli zengin olmasına bağlayabiliriz. Searle, argümanının beynin kelimenin tam anlamıyla bir bilgisayar, zihnin de bir bilgisayar programı olduğunu ileri süren kompütasyonalizmin kesin ve net bir reddi olarak görse de, bize ve birçoklarına göre argüman onun düşündüğü kadar ikna edici değildir. Bu çalışmada Çin Odası Argümanı Searle’nin genel (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A Way to Describe and Evaluate Thought Experiments, or Trying to Get a Grip on Virtual Reality.Lawrence G. Souder - unknowndetails The use of thought experiments seems to provoke much controversy, often in the form of charges of appeals to intuition. The notion of intuition, however, is vaguely defined in both the context of thought experiments and in philosophy in general. This vagueness suggests that the description of thought experiments is incomplete, and thus the prospect for their evaluation remains unfulfilled. Previous analyses of thought experiments have come largely from philosophy where the focus has been on truth value and validity. But (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
The duality of psycho-physics.S. Klein - 1991 - In Andrei Gorea (ed.), Representations of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research. Cambridge University Press. pp. 231--249.details Download Export citation Bookmark 3 citations
The broad conception of computation.Jack Copeland - 1997 - American Behavioral Scientist 40 (6):690-716.details A myth has arisen concerning Turing's paper of 1936, namely that Turing set forth a fundamental principle concerning the limits of what can be computed by machine - a myth that has passed into cognitive science and the philosophy of mind, to wide and pernicious effect. This supposed principle, sometimes incorrectly termed the 'Church-Turing thesis', is the claim that the class of functions that can be computed by machines is identical to the class of functions that can be computed by (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 19 citations
Commentary on Souder.Daniel H. Cohen - unknowndetails Download Export citation Bookmark
A Critique of the Learning Brain.Joakim Olsson - unknowndetails The guiding question for this essay is: who is the learner? The aim is to examine and criticize one answer to this question, sometimes referred to as the theory of the learning brain, which suggests that the explanation of human learning can be reduced to the transmitting and storing of information in the brain’s formal and representational architecture, i.e., that the brain is the learner. This essay will argue that this answer is misleading, because it cannot account for the way (...) Download Export citation Bookmark

1
2