Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The right to withdraw from controlled human infection studies: Justifications and avoidance.Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):833-848.
    The right to withdraw from research without penalty is well established around the world. However, it has been challenged in some corners of bioethics based on concerns about various harms—to participants, to scientific integrity, and to research bystanders—that may stem from withdrawal. These concerns have become particularly salient in emerging debates about the ethics of controlled human infection (CHI) studies in which participants are intentionally infected with pathogens, often in inpatient settings with extensive follow‐up. In this article, I provide support (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Right to Withdraw from Research.G. Owen Schaefer & Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):329-352.
    The right to withdraw from participation in research is recognized in virtually all national and international guidelines for research on human subjects. It is therefore surprising that there has been little justification for that right in the literature. We argue that the right to withdraw should protect research participants from information imbalance, inability to hedge, inherent uncertainty, and untoward bodily invasion, and it serves to bolster public trust in the research enterprise. Although this argument is not radical, it provides a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in registration cohorts for phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study.Edith A. M. Tarimo & Masunga K. Iseselo - 2024 - BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-13.
    BackgroundInformed consent as stipulated in regulatory human research guidelines requires volunteers to be well-informed about what will happen to them in a trial. However, researchers may be faced with the challenge of how to ensure that a volunteer agreeing to take part in a clinical trial is truly informed. This study aimed to find out volunteers’ comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) clinical trials during the registration cohort.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study among volunteers who (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Inalienable Right to Withdraw from Research.Terrance McConnell - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):840-846.
    Consent forms given to potential subjects in research protocols typically contain a sentence like this: “You have a right to withdraw from this study at any time without penalty.” If you have ever served on an institutional review board or a research ethics committee, you have no doubt read such a sentence often. Moreover, codes of ethics governing medical research endorse such a right. For example, paragraph 24 of the Declaration of Helsinki says, “The subject should be informed of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (1 other version)Two Ways to Transfer a Bodily Right.Hallie Liberto - 2018 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (1):46-63.
    _ Source: _Page Count 18 There are two ways to transfer a bodily right. One might transfer a bodily right in a detaching way – that is, without transferring jurisdiction over one’s future bodily choices. Alternately, one might transfer a bodily right in an attaching way – that is, in a way that transfers such jurisdiction. For instance, A might sell his kidney to B for money paid at the time of the transplant. Alternately, A might accept money now, agreeing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The evolution of withdrawal: negotiating research relationships in biobanking.Karen Melham, Linda Briceno Moraia, Colin Mitchell, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare & Jane Kaye - 2014 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1).
    The right to withdraw from research, along with the necessity of adequately informed consent, is at the heart of the post-Nuremburg code of ethical safeguards in biomedical research on human participants. As biomedical research moves away from direct interventional studies towards research using networks of linked human tissue samples and data, however, questions arise about what withdrawal can and should mean in these new contexts. Some of the more expansive traditional understandings, such as the right to withdraw from a study (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
    It is generally assumed in research ethics that research participants have an unconditional right to withdraw from research without any detriment or reprisal. This paper analyses this right in the context of biobank research and argues that the traditional shape of the right in clinical research can be modified in biobank research without incurring significant ethical cost. The paper falls in three parts. The first part is a brief explication of the philosophical justification of the right to withdraw. The second (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations