Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Teleological Exploration of the Plausibility of Moral Knowledge.Kevin Lebel King - unknown
    Natural selection seems to offer a compelling case for the development of evaluative judgments independent of evaluative facts. If such a case can be made, then how do moral judgments correlate to moral facts? It seems that there would be no tight connection from judgments to truth and moral judgments would be unwarranted. Gilbert Harman realized the implications of a probable non-moral genealogy. Richard Joyce goes on to provide a probable non-moral genealogy that would epistemically undermine moral judgments as Harman (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Value Judgments: How to Reason About Value Judgments.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:173-190.
    When opinion polls are conducted on some urgent matter of the day those polled are permitted to declare themselves ‘Don't Knows’. It is usually a minority who are so ill-disposed as to forget their civic duty to have an opinion on each and every subject, and they can usually expect to be rebuked as fence-sitters or slugabeds. People confronted by the demand that they take sides can generally produce a ‘view’ which they maintain against all-comers without the slightest attempt to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Value Judgments: How to Reason About Value Judgments.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:173-190.
    When opinion polls are conducted on some urgent matter of the day those polled are permitted to declare themselves ‘Don't Knows’. It is usually a minority who are so ill-disposed as to forget their civic duty to have an opinion on each and every subject, and they can usually expect to be rebuked as fence-sitters or slugabeds. People confronted by the demand that they take sides can generally produce a ‘view’ which they maintain against all-comers without the slightest attempt to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reason, reality and objectivity – shared dogmas and distortions in the way both 'scientistic' and 'postmodern' commentators frame the EBM debate.Michael Loughlin - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):665-671.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Value Judgments.Marcus G. Singer - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:145-190.
    A person's values are what that person regards as or thinks important; a society's values are what that society regards as important. A society's values are expressed in laws and legislatively enacted policies, in its mores, social habits, and positive morality. Any body's values—an individual person's or a society's—are subject to change, and in our time especially. An individual manifests his or her values in expressions of approval or disapproval, of admiration or disdain, by seeking or avoidance behaviour, and by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Thinking About How and Why to Think.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (277):385-403.
    1. Believing Enough to ThinkThe Scottish system of university education requires most aspirants to an Ordinary Degree to study some philosophy. Philosophers in Scottish Universities must therefore contend with enormous first-year classes, stocked with youngsters who have little real desire to be philosophers, or even to philosophize. Some years ago, at Glasgow, a question in the final exam was as follows: ‘“Philosophy is of no use, and so should not be studied.” Discuss’. A couple of hundred students answered, more or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Criticizing the data: some concerns about empirical approaches to ethics.Michael Loughlin - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):970-975.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Science, Practice and Mythology: A Definition and Examination of the Implications of Scientism in Medicine. [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin, George Lewith & Torkel Falkenberg - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (2):130-145.
    Scientism is a philosophy which purports to define what the world ‘really is’. It adopts what the philosopher Thomas Nagel called ‘an epistemological criterion of reality’, defining what is real as that which can be discovered by certain quite specific methods of investigation. As a consequence all features of experience not revealed by those methods are deemed ‘subjective’ in a way that suggests they are either not real, or lie beyond the scope of meaningful rational inquiry. This devalues capacities that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The basis of medical knowledge: judgement, objectivity and the history of ideas.Michael Loughlin - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):935-940.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Response—Forty-Seven Years Later: Further Studies in Disappointment?Michael Loughlin - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):31-36.
    This paper provides a commentary on “Vascular amputees: A study in disappointment” and its significance in the development of the disability rights movement, as well as the movements for values-based medicine and person-centred health and social care.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Psychiatry, objectivity, and realism about value.Michael Loughlin & Andrew Miles - 2014 - In .
    Discussions of diagnosis in mental illness are still beset by the suspicion that ‘value judgements’ are in some special sense ‘subjective’. The history of the debate about the reality of mental illness has seen a divide between those who accept that diagnosis is ‘value-laden’ and therefore accept a relativist/subjectivist account of mental illness, and those who feel the need to deny the value-laden nature of diagnosis to defend the reality of mental illness. More nuanced analyses note that all medical diagnosis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations