Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Ecological Thinking.Carolyn J. Craig - 2021 - In Nancy Arden McHugh & Andrea Doucet (eds.), Thinking ecologically, thinking responsibly: the legacies of Lorraine Code. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 149-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Bioethics and the Challenge of the Ecological Individual.Jonathan Beever & Nicolae Morar - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):215-238.
    Questions of individuality are traditionally predicated upon recognizing discrete entities whose behavior can be measured and whose value and agency can be meaningfully ascribed. We consider a series of challenges to the metaphysical concept of individuality as the ground of the self. We argue that an ecological conception of individuality renders ascriptions of autonomy to selves highly improbable. We find conceptual resources in the work of environmental philosopher Arne Naess, whose distinction between shallow and deep responses helps us rethink the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Thinking ecologically, thinking responsibly: the legacies of Lorraine Code.Nancy Arden McHugh & Andrea Doucet (eds.) - 2021 - Albany: SUNY Press.
    Engages and extends the feminist philosopher Lorraine Code's groundbreaking work on epistemology and ethics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Perceptions of Undue Influence Shed Light on the Folk Conception of Autonomy.Fay Niker, Peter B. Reiner & Gidon Felsen - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:392196.
    Advances in psychology and neuroscience have elucidated the social aspects of human agency, leading to a broad shift in our thinking about fundamental concepts such as autonomy and responsibility. Here, we address a critical aspect of this inquiry by investigating how people consider the socio-relational nature of their own agency, particularly the influence of others on their perceived control over their decisions and actions. Specifically, in a series of studies using contrastive vignettes, we examine public attitudes about when external influences (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ¿Vulnerabilidad personal o contextual? Aproximaciones al análisis del derecho en perspectiva de género.Susanna Pozzolo - 2019 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 51:1-28.
    El trabajo desarrolla una crítica y una propuesta sobre el uso de la calificación de vulnerable desde una perspectiva de género. A partir de un análisis crítico del concepto de autonomía clásica, se propone como científicamente más productiva la noción de autonomía relacional, que se considera más apta para explicar las acciones humanas reales, de personas no idealizadas, y se revela capaz de dar sentido al caso de las acciones relativamente constreñidas. Desde esta perspectiva se aborda el análisis de algunos (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Porosity of Autonomy: (Some) Replies to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine”.Jonathan Beever & Nicolae Morar - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):4-6.
    Autonomy isn't going anywhere. Yet challenges to autonomy's place of privilege atop the mantle of bioethics are similarly perennial. From our perspective, the emerging literature of microbial biolo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Voices Missing from the Autonomy Discourse (Are Also the Most Indispensable).Julia D. Gibson - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):77-98.
    Jonathan Beever and Nicolae Morar’s (2016) article “The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine” and its accompanying commentaries in the American Journal of Bioethics—though insightful, innovative, and provocative—overlook key interlocutors necessary for any discussion of whether the mid-twentieth-century biomedical principle of autonomy should be revised or revoked. The conversation sparked by “The Porosity of Autonomy” will remain both incomplete and politically untenable so long as there is no meaningful engagement with persons/communities who appeal to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations