- On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-205.details
|
|
Reforming peer review: From recycling to reflexivity.Daryl E. Chubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):204-204.details
|
|
Decision Theoretic Model of the Productivity Gap.Liam Kofi Bright - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (2):421-442.details
|
|
Preparation for professional self-regulation.John M. Braxton & Leonard L. Baird - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):593-610.details
|
|
Whom shall we Put on the Postage Stamps?Roger D. Boyle - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (3):695-707.details
|
|
Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the “Science War”.Pepka Boyadjieva, Kristina Petkova & Martin W. Bauer - 2000 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (1):30-51.details
|
|
The trap of intellectual success: Robert N. Bellah, the American civil religion debate, and the sociology of knowledge.Matteo Bortolini - 2012 - Theory and Society 41 (2):187-210.details
|
|
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.details
|
|
Peer review and the structure of knowledge.Marian Blissett - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):203-204.details
|
|
Explaining an unsurprising demonstration: High rejection rates and scarcity of space.Janice M. Beyer - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):202-203.details
|
|
Computer-assisted referee selection as a means of reducing potential editorial bias.H. Russell Bernard - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):202-202.details
|
|
Peer review and the Current Anthropology experience.Cyril Belshaw - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):200-201.details
|
|
On the failure to detect previously published research.Donald deB Beaver - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):199-200.details
|
|
Literate acts and the emergent social structure of science: A critical synthesis.Charles Bazerman - 1987 - Social Epistemology 1 (4):295 – 310.details
|
|
The fate of published articles, submitted again.John J. Bartko - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):199-199.details
|
|
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.details
|
|
Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula.J. Scott Armstrong - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):197-199.details
|
|
Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A. D. Darbishire to Mendelism.Rachel A. Ankeny - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):315 - 347.details
|
|
Peer review: An unflattering picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.details
|
|
A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Robert K. Adair - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):196-196.details
|
|
(1 other version)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-255.details
|
|
(1 other version)Unraveling Scientific Impact: Citation types in marketing journals.Stefan Stremersch, Nuno Camacho, Sofie Vanneste & Isabel Verniers - 2015 - International Journal of Research in Marketing 32 (1):64-77.details
|
|
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?Kurt Salzinger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-162.details
|
|
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.Peter Tyrer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):164-165.details
|
|
Accumulating academic freedom for intellectual leadership: Women professors’ experiences in Hong Kong.Nian Ruan - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (11):1097-1107.details
|
|
Patterns of Research Productivity in the Business Ethics Literature: Insights from Analyses of Bibliometric Distributions. [REVIEW]Debabrata Talukdar - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):137 - 151.details
|
|
Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.details
|
|
Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.details
|
|
Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose.Sandra Scarr - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):237-238.details
|
|
Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity.Mari Teigen & Svein Kyvik - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (1):54-71.details
|
|
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.Byron P. Rourke - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):161-161.details
|
|
Reliability and validity of peer review.David Zeaman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-245.details
|
|
Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.details
|
|
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.details
|
|
Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.details
|
|
(1 other version)Some comments on the inability of sociology of science to explain science.Steven Miller & Marcel Fredericks - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (1-2):73-86.details
|
|
Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship.Jordan R. Schoenherr - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.details
|
|
In praise of randomness.Peter H. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-163.details
|
|
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.Lawrence J. Stricker - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):163-164.details
|
|
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):165-166.details
|
|
Bias, incompetence, or bad management?John Ziman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-246.details
|
|
Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.William A. Wilson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):242-243.details
|
|
Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.Donald B. Rubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-237.details
|
|
Stuck in the Middle: Doctoral Education Ranking and Career Outcomes for Life Scientists.Laurel Smith-Doerr - 2006 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (3):243-255.details
|
|