Switch to: References

Citations of:

6. From the Actual to the Possible: Non-identity Thinking

In Donald Burke, Colin J. Campbell, Kathy Kiloh, Michael Palamarek & Jonathan Short (eds.), Adorno and the Need in Thinking: New Critical Essays. University of Toronto Press. pp. 163-180 (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Critical Theory as a Legacy of Post-Kantianism.James A. Clarke & Owen Hulatt - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1047-1068.
    This paper traces some lines of influence between post-Kantianism and Critical Theory. In the first part of the paper, we discuss Fichte and Hegel; in the second, we discuss Horkheimer, Adorno, and Honneth.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Cold, cold, warm: Autonomy, intimacy and maturity in Adorno.Iain Macdonald - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (6):669-689.
    When Adorno refers to the concept of maturity (Mündigkeit), he generally means having the courage and the ability to use one’s own understanding independently of dominant heteronomous patterns of thought. This Kantian-sounding claim is essentially an exhortation: maturity demands self-liberation from heteronomy, i.e. autonomy. The problem, however, is that in spite of Adorno’s general endorsement of Kant’s definition of maturity, he ultimately rejects the corresponding Kantian definition of autonomy. Yet Adorno does not simply discard the Kantian concept of autonomy. On (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Social critique in the totally socialized society.Matthias Benzer - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):575-603.
    The article examines Adorno’s conviction that a critique of concepts inevitably entails a critique of society. Some commentators, notably Cook, read Adorno’s idea of the seamless transition from conceptual to social critique as dependent on the use of normative concepts. According to this ‘Marxist’ reading, a critique of unfaithful concepts provokes a persuasive and constructive critique of society for failing to fulfil concepts. This line of argument creates problems. Adorno’s inquiries into society’s resistance to decipherment imply that the progression from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark