Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy.Uwe Peters - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (3):393-419.
    It has been argued that implicit biases are operative in philosophy and lead to significant epistemic costs in the field. Philosophers working on this issue have focussed mainly on implicit gender and race biases. They have overlooked ideological bias, which targets political orientations. Psychologists have found ideological bias in their field and have argued that it has negative epistemic effects on scientific research. I relate this debate to the field of philosophy and argue that if, as some studies suggest, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The Multidimensional Religious Ideology scale.Wesley J. Wildman, Connor P. Wood, Catherine Caldwell-Harris, Nicholas DiDonato & Aimee Radom - 2021 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 43 (3):213-252.
    The Multidimensional Religious Ideology (MRI) scale is a new 43-item measure that quantifies conservative versus liberal aspects of religious ideology. The MRI focuses on recurring features of ideology rooted in innate moral instincts while capturing salient differences in the ideological profiles of distinct groups and individuals. The MRI highlights how religious ideology differs from political ideology while maintaining a robust grounding in the social psychology of ideology generally. Featuring three major dimensions (religious beliefs, religious practices, and religious morality) and eight (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Implicit Bias and Philosophy , Edited by Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 640, £60 ISBN: 9780298713241. [REVIEW]Sean Hermanson - 2017 - Philosophy 92 (2):315-322.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark