Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy

Mind and Language 34 (3):393-419 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It has been argued that implicit biases are operative in philosophy and lead to significant epistemic costs in the field. Philosophers working on this issue have focussed mainly on implicit gender and race biases. They have overlooked ideological bias, which targets political orientations. Psychologists have found ideological bias in their field and have argued that it has negative epistemic effects on scientific research. I relate this debate to the field of philosophy and argue that if, as some studies suggest, the same bias also exists in philosophy then it will lead to hitherto unrecognised epistemic hazards in the field. Furthermore, the bias is epistemically different from the more familiar biases in respects that are important for epistemology, ethics, and metaphilosophy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETIBI-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-01
Latest version: 5 (2018-06-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Heterogeneity of Implicit Bias.Holroyd, Jules & Sweetman, Joseph

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-01

Total views
479 ( #6,169 of 42,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #5,214 of 42,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.