Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-reflective talk in group counselling.Jaana Laitinen, Johanna Ruusuvuori & Aija Logren - 2017 - Discourse Studies 19 (4):422-440.
    Reflective processing is a joint social action that develops in interaction. Using conversation analysis and discursive psychology, this article focuses on self-reflective turns of talk in group counselling for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes. We show how reflective processing unfolds in patterns of interaction, wherein group members take an observing, evaluating or interpreting position towards their own actions and experiences. Self-reflective talk is neither exclusively dependent on counsellors’ actions nor limited to the niches the counselling programme structure offers. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Extending client-centered support: Counselors' proposals to shift from e-mail to telephone counseling.Jessica Harris, Susan Danby, Carly W. Butler & Michael Emmison - 2012 - Text and Talk 32 (1):21-37.
    The availability and use of online counseling approaches has increased rapidly over the last decade. While research has suggested a range of potential affordances and limitations of online counseling modalities, very few studies have offered detailed examinations of how counselors and clients manage asynchronous e-mail counseling exchanges. In this paper we examine e-mail exchanges involving clients and counselors through Kids Helpline, a national Australian counseling service that offers free online, e-mail, and telephone counseling for young people up to the age (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • We say: ‘...’, they say: ‘...’: How plant science experts draw on reported dialogue to shelve user concerns.Bart Gremmen, Cees van Woerkum, Hedwig te Molder & Karen Mogendorff - 2014 - Discourse and Communication 8 (2):137-154.
    This study aims to increase insight into the uses of experts’ references to physically absent technology users in government-funded plant science. A discursive psychological analysis of expert board meetings shows that experts invoke various forms of reported dialogue/thoughts and dispositional statements when problems with technology and with program funding are discussed. Forms of reported dialogue serve to demonstrate that experts engage in dialogue with users, understand and are reasonable about users’ concerns, and that the content of user concerns does not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation