De Vries’ article essentially makes what could be called a negative case for state neuro-neutrality: identifying and refuting what he believes are the strongest arguments against it (de Vries 2024)...

Increased awareness of neurodiverse conditions has necessitated reexamination of neurodiversity in relation to societal norms and material conditions. ‘Neuro-neutrality’, as proposed by de Vries (2...

There is broad agreement that states should be neutral in historically core domains such as religion or speech; the freedoms of religion and speech are protected under liberal constitutions around...

De Vries (2024) argues that states should address inequalities ex­perienced by neurodivergent people by becoming “significantly more neuro-neutral than they are today.” We fully agree with this cla...

“The great powers of the world may have done wonders in giving the world an industrial look, but the great gift still has to come from Africa—giving the world a more human face.”—Steve BikoUndersta...

Many, if not almost all political theorists, think that there are groups such that states are under a norm enjoining them: not to discriminate against members of these groups; to adopt a policy of...