Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. "Consciousness". Selected Bibliography 1970 - 2004.Thomas Metzinger - unknown
    This is a bibliography of books and articles on consciousness in philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience over the last 30 years. There are three main sections, devoted to monographs, edited collections of papers, and articles. The first two of these sections are each divided into three subsections containing books in each of the main areas of research. The third section is divided into 12 subsections, with 10 subject headings for philosophical articles along with two additional subsections for articles in cognitive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Split brains and atomic persons.James Moor - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (March):91-106.
    Many have claimed that split-brain patients are actually two persons. I maintain that both the traditional separation argument and the more recent sophistication argument for the two persons interpretation are inadequate on conceptual grounds. An autonomy argument is inadequate on empirical grounds. Overall, theoretical and practical consequences weigh heavily in favor of adopting a one person interpretation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • What sort of persons are hemispheres? Another look at ‘split-brain’ man.Daniel N. Robinson - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):73-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • The mute self: A reaction to DeWitt's alternative account of the split-brain data.Roland Puccetti - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):65-73.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Puccetti and brain bisection: An attempt at mental division.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (September):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Puccetti and Brain Bisection.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation