Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nietzsche and the Significance of Genealogy.Alexander Prescott-Couch - 2024 - Mind 133 (531):623-650.
    How is Nietzsche’s genealogy of morality relevant to his revaluation of values? I consider and reject three accounts: contingency accounts, pedigree accounts, and unmasking accounts. I then propose an alternative account. On this view, Nietzsche provides a ‘deconstructive genealogy’ that indicates whether and where we should expect to find unity in our current moral practices. Moreover, Nietzsche’s history contributes to a critique of contemporary morality because it reveals that morality is unlikely to have the kind of unity required by many (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • IV—The Limits of Immanent Critique.Rachel Fraser - forthcoming - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
    The tradition of immanent critique promises a lot. It promises to be critical of the existing social order without appealing to ‘external’ normative standards. I argue that the prospects for immanent criticism are bleak: they must either commit to an implausible social ontology, a flawed meta-normative theory, or both.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Human nature, history, and the limits of critique.Kieran Setiya - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):3-16.
    This essay defends a form of ethical naturalism in which ethical knowledge is explained by human nature. Human nature, here, is not the essence of the species but its natural history as socially and historically determined. The argument does not lead to social relativism, but it does place limits on the scope of ethical critique. As society becomes “total”, critique can only be immanent; to this extent, Adorno and the Frankfurt School are right.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Basic equality: A Hegelian resolution.Jonny Thakkar - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):507-531.
    Contemporary political philosophers often take for granted that for political purposes all humans are to be considered of equal worth. The difficulty, as Bernard Williams observed, is to find an interpretation of this claim that does not collapse into absurdity or triviality. I show that the principal attempts to solve this problem all beg the question against an Aristotelian proponent of natural hierarchy. I then explore existing proposals for dissolving the problem of basic equality, whether by denying the need for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation