Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Confucius’ Zhong-Shu and Zhuangzi’s Qiwu: Zhang Taiyan’s Parallel Interpretation.Cheng Wang - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (1):53-71.
    To avoid the one-sidedness and abuse of the rule of xieju 絜矩, Zhang Taiyan 章太炎 redefines zhong-shu 忠恕, the Confucian golden rule, as two separate yet complementary principles, the idea of which is most manifestly drawn from Zhuangzi’s 莊子 “Qiwulun 齊物論”. Zhang’s association of zhong-shu and qiwu 齊物 is based upon his vision of equality premised on recognition of and respect for differences. In Zhang’s reading of the Zhuangzi in light of Yogācāra, the crucial “concept matching” is the explanation of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Bibliografía seleccionada y comentada sobre Taoísmo Clásico : Dao De Jing.Javier Bustamante Donas & Juan Luis Varona - 2016 - 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de Las Religiones 21:211-246.
    Bibliografía seleccionada y comentada sobre Taoísmo Clásico : Dao De Jing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the philosophical function of the ‘sage’ in the Laozi.Paul J. D’Ambrosio - 2022 - Asian Philosophy 32 (4):420-438.
    In philosophical interpretations of the Laozi the function of the ‘sage’ is a relatively under concentrated on topic. Although nearly every scholar does have something to say about the sage, comments are usually brief and often revolve around the sage as some particular character-type; for example highlighting the sage as a ‘sage-ruler’. In this article we will argue that the sage serves as a tool for understanding the major concepts, thinking, and logic of the Laozi. While the sage does often (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation